Union Leader Logo

Site Search

 Events Calendar

$978,000 allocated in death penalty case

Share on Facebook

Reader comments

By KATHRYN MARCHOCKI
New Hampshire Union Leader Staff

Nearly $978,000 has been allocated to date for the capital murder case against Michael K. "Stix" Addison and requests for more money likely will be made before Addison stands trial in September for allegedly killing a Manchester police officer, attorneys involved in the case said.

Addison, 27, pleaded innocent to shooting bicycle patrol officer Michael L. Briggs, 35, once in the head Oct. 16, 2006. Briggs died the next day. If convicted, Addison could face the death penalty.

The New Hampshire Public Defender Office, which represents Addison, will have spent about $530,000 in attorney salaries, investigators and office costs alone by the end of the fiscal year on June 30, the office's executive director Christopher Keating said.

In addition, the court so far has approved another $27,935 for experts, forensic analysis and other special services for Addison's defense, New Hampshire Judicial Council executive director Nina Gardner said.

Keating estimates this figure "could double or even triple" by the time Addison's trial ends.

Meanwhile, the Attorney General's Office has hired two attorneys, a paralegal and a part-time secretary and purchased computer software with the $420,000 a legislative fiscal committee gave it in October 2006 to cover the extra cost of prosecuting a capital murder case, Attorney General Kelly A. Ayotte said.

Her office so far has spent $270,714 from this fund and expects to ask the committee for more money before the case goes to trial, she said.

This does not include the cost of the multiple, salaried state prosecutors who have been preparing the case for trial and litigating numerous pre-trial issues, many related to defense challenges to the constitutionality of the state's death penalty statute, Ayotte said. Many of these attorneys work on other cases and it's difficult to track time spent exclusively on the capital murder case, she said.

"Certainly, this is an intense case," Ayotte said. She estimated about eight lawyers work on the case at any one time.

"We pool our collective knowledge and experience on it,'" she explained.

The newly-hired attorneys are doing work that frees up more experienced homicide prosecutors to work full-time or devote most of their time to the Briggs' case, she said.

In addition to state prosecutors, Hillsborough County attorneys have won two convictions against Addison in a shooting and armed robbery that occurred within days of Briggs' murder. Addison will face trial in another armed hold up Feb. 19.

The county cases are directly related to the capital murder case because the state alleges they are aggravating factors that support its decision to seek the death penalty, Ayotte said.

Addison's defense costs are being paid through the New Hampshire Judicial Fund, a state agency that handles all indigent defense costs and gets it funding from the state's general fund, Gardner said. The agency funds the public defender office. It also funds all court-approved requests for other services, she said.

YOUR COMMENTS


Does death penalty work?

In 2002 Americans were very happy because they had only 16.638 criminal homicides: and they were right because from 1984 to 1993 criminal homicides were 22.000 per year. Au contraire, in the same 2002, in Italy we were very afraid because, with a population that is grosso modo one fifth of the American one, we had 638 criminal homicides, and we were very concerned about it, even if those 638 were less than one third the homicides we had in 1991. Americans love to think the drop is a benefit of the death penalty. We cannot agree because we are a death penalty free country. (In Europe this punishment is strictly forbidden and the majority of the world is abolitionist).
Actually Italy ended capital punishment in 1877 and had it again only under fascism. In those sad years the homicide rate was five times bigger that we have now, and, in the twenty years following the definitive end of the death penalty (1948-1968), the homicide rate dropped from 5 to 1,4. Something like this happened in Canada in the years that followed the end of capital punishment in 1976. Curiously, in the same year, the Supreme Court gave green light to the “new and improved” American death penalty and, with the shooting of Gary Gilmore (17th January 1977): the hangman was back in business and the experiment begun. Now, after more than 1.000 human sacrifices, we can say with Justice Blackmun: “the death penalty experiment has failed”.
Death penalty is an enormous waste of lives, money, time and resources. This cancer is destroying the American justice. It is not a deterrent and kills the poor, the weak, the mad, the illiterate, and the black. In the thousand killed some were innocent, many mad and much many not guilty of a capital crime, but quite all will be alive, and some free, if they have had a competent counsel. Hangman states are not in a better situation of states without death penalty. Sooner or later Americans will realise that death penalty is an immoral, indecent, illegal, expensive, stupid, cruel, dangerous, racist, classist, not working violation of human rights.
- claudio giusti, Forlì italia

NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)