Union Leader Logo

Site Search

 Events Calendar

Hostage-taker back in handcuffs days after release

Share on Facebook

Reader comments

By CLYNTON NAMUO
New Hampshire Union Leader Correspondent

Leeland Eisenberg's freedom didn't last long.

Two years ago, Eisenberg used fake explosives to take several hostages at then-Sen. Hillary Clinton's Rochester campaign office. On Monday, less than a week after he'd gotten out of prison on that offense, he was arrested for allegedly violating his probation because he did not charge the GPS monitor used to track his movements after his release.

Strafford County Superior Court Judge Kenneth Brown ordered Eisenberg held on $20,000 cash bail yesterday after a brief hearing at which the judge said he was "amazed" Eisenberg was back in court, particularly because they had a hearing last week to go over terms of his probation.

"Now you're trying to tell me you didn't know how to plug in your GPS," Brown said. "I have hundreds of people out on GPS, and I've never had anybody have that problem before."

Brown said Eisenberg would have a bail hearing at a later date.

County Attorney Thomas Velardi harshly criticized Eisenberg in court and said he violated his probation every day since having been released from state prison last Wednesday. He said Eisenberg didn't charge his GPS monitor despite having gotten detailed instructions, both written and spoken.

"There are two possibilities: one is that Mr. Eisenberg is so incredibly ignorant that he can't figure out how to plug something into the wall, or two, he's playing games with community corrections," Velardi said, noting he is leaning toward the latter.

Upon his release, Eisenberg was put on strict probation, which included a curfew, GPS monitoring and frequent testing for alcohol use.

091124 Eisenberg (135px) file pix

Leeland Eisenberg (file photo)

Eisenberg was released after having served about two years in jail since pleading guilty to several charges related to his taking hostages. He also has a suspended sentence of 3 1/2 years still hanging over him.

Velardi said he has not decided whether to try to bring that sentence forward.

Eisenberg, who said he lives in a small apartment in Dover, stated he has only one electrical outlet available to him, and it has so many things plugged into it that the GPS monitor came out without his knowledge.

"It wasn't intentional," he said. "I thought it was plugged in."

Eisenberg was supposed to be in court yesterday in response to a stalking petition filed by Laurie Lynch, the owner of Portsmouth-based specialty food maker LollipopTree.

Lynch filed the petition saying Eisenberg has written her several letters from state prison since September asking for a job. She said he learned of her and her business through her son, who is in state prison, and that he could bring lots of positive media attention on her business if she hired him.

But the letters also provided intimate personal information, according to Lynch's court filings. Although she provided copies for the court, she sought to have them all sealed.

"The release of these letters publicly could cause public humiliation and even financial losses to the family business," Lynch said in her request.

Judge Brown said he could seal the letters, but they would be opened as soon as someone filed the necessary paperwork to do so.

When Lynch learned this, she chose instead to accept a verbal guarantee from Eisenberg that he would not contact her or her family again. She also dropped the stalking petition and took back the letters.

(An editorial) Plain crazy: Hostage taker released
'Keep this man under lock and key right now' (4)
Hostage crisis ends peacefully (10)

YOUR COMMENTS


Michael D. Houst - before you call the law enforcement officials morons, you really should get some facts. As "concerned" indicated, you should watch the news broadcast on WMUR. This equipment is like plugging a lamp into a wall outlet. It's that simple. He was let out because his sentences were complete - it's not the county attorney, prison officials, county officials or the probation officer's fault. A plan was developed to provide the best possible, and most strict supervision available because his jail sentences were finished - he was coming back into the community. Your other statements about him just being mentally ill (as it should be some type of excuse), his actions being a "political protest," and no one was directly threatened -- they are ignorant and (taking a word from you) moronic. How would you have felt (or continue to feel today) if a loved one of yours was in that office at the time of the "political protest."
- greg, Dover

It is a shame that people dont look at the overall picture of this man's history. He was in prison for rape, escaped from prison and raped again. Union Leader December 2004, "Rundles said Eisenberg's criminal history began in Massachusetts in 1978 when he was convicted of possession of a knife, then assault with a deadly weapon in 1981. That was followed by "a couple of theft-related offenses" in Florida in 1981 and 1982, burglary and larceny in Fitchburg, Mass., in 1982, and then a conviction for rape in Worcester, Mass. in 1985, for which he was sentenced to 10 years in prison. During his time in the Bay State, Eisenberg was known as Ralph Woodward, Rundles said.

Eisenberg escaped from jail in 1986, Rundles said, and while out committed another rape and an assault with a deadly weapon. He was convicted on both charges. He was also convicted in New Hampshire of failure to report as a sex offender in 2005 and had various domestic violence charges this year, including a conviction for stalking this summer."
Before we call the people in charge of protecting the community morons; we should get more information about how difficult the restrictions were. See the news report on channel 9 at 6:00 last night? Doesn't seem that difficult. Thanks to all the Probation Officers that help keep the streets safe. Seems like they did their job. I applaud them.
- concerned, dover

Deb, Derry: I"m with you. His family has apparently written him off and is getting off with a 'free pass'. That isn't right. When are we going to demand that family stand up and take responsibility for their own?
As long as the State steps in a assumes responsibility without placing responsibility first on the family and then following through with financial penalties we are going to see this type of stupidity continue.
- Sandy, Thornton

If this was a crazy woman, not only would she have tons of special government help (inside and outside of prison), she would probably have people around holding candlelight vigils asking for the poor woman to be freed. But yet again, this country hates men...
- Kevin, Portsmouth, NH

PJ you are 100% correct I think. He is asking for help the only way he can. But I can't help but wonder why his closest relatives are not the ones who should be getting him the help. Why is it always the burden of the state and tax payer or maybe a combination of the two? Either way he needs to be somewhere where he and others are kept safe.
- Deb, Derry

The man is mentally ill.
His hostage taking action was proven to be no direct threat to any one; but was meant as a political protest for our inadequate federal and state mental health programs. So a release after 2 years isn't a big deal.

The revocation of probation is because some moron or group of morons working for the state weren't able to see that multiple monitors for "a strict curfew", "GPS monitoring" and "frequent testing for alcohol use" were beyond Eisenberg's ability to get them all right.
- Michael D. Houst, Barrington, NH

Apparently this man still needs the help he was demanding when he held people hostage at the Clinton office. He can't handle being out in society. The state needs to put back the mental health workers that were let go from the layoffs and cut a few of the DOT workers leaning on shovels!! This man is asking for help in his own demented way and the NH Legal/Prison system can't see that. Maybe this guy is smarter than the people running this state!
- PJ LHEUREUX, WEARE

This is what happens when you lock up too many drug addicts who are not deterred by prison time.. They are overcrowded so naturally the pedophiles, rapists, and pther violent criminals are released. Let drug addicts off, they will figure it out eventually and seek help- or survival of the fittest. Lock up the scary guys, leave Joe Pothead alone..
- Beth, Raymond

I knew I should have bet with my spouse on how long it would be before Leeland was back behind bars.
- Margie S., Manchester

Poor Leeland, I feel so bad for you. I do hope you get the help you so need.
Darn those monitors are so hard to figure out how to work 'em.
- Michelle Dodge, Milford NH

i do not think he should of got out of prison. I think he should of stay in there
- a. lantz, manchester

What is wrong with our court system? A man takes people hostage, has a lengthy stand off with police on the national spotlight and is back on the street in less than 2 years. I think he must of learned his lesson.
- Adam, Newport

Who did NOT see the coming?
- Tim, Derry

NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)