Union Leader Logo

Site Search

NH REAL ESTATE
search by town or realtor


Exact  Similar

Results in pop-up window

CLICK HERE to place an online ad for items valued under $500 for free.

Browse Opinion by Topic

Jim Roche: NH cannot tax businesses any more without doing harm

Share on Facebook

Reader comments

By JIM ROCHE

"Do no harm" is the primary tenet for such varied tasks as restoring antique furniture or fine art, or even providing emergency medical treatment. The reasoning is straightforward. When addressing a delicate task, it's critically important not to do something that makes the situation worse. This simple concept is one we hope state legislators of both political parties follow as they set policy and craft the next state budget.

Lawmakers must fill the $75 million to $100 million gap in this year's budget before June 30. Then they must address the huge budget shortfall -- perhaps half a billion dollars -- for fiscal 2010 and 2011. Finding new revenue and making additional budget cuts will be, at best, challenging. It will be an even greater challenge given the current U.S. and worldwide recession.

We all know business taxes are an important source of revenue for government. What many people don't realize is that New Hampshire businesses are already the state's largest source of tax revenue. Businesses contribute more than $600 million in business profits taxes (BPT) and business enterprise taxes (BET) each year.

In past years, when the Legislature was faced with a significant deficit, the solution -- the places they eventually turned to "fill the gap" -- were the BPT and BET. Given current economic conditions, this option, if chosen again, will bring damaging results to private-sector employers and the hundreds of thousands of working men and women they employ.

Contrary to popular opinion, New Hampshire is not necessarily a "tax haven" for business. At 8.5 percent, the BPT is already one of the highest in the country. Overall, businesses contribute 55 percent of all taxes collected at the state and local levels. The national average is 44 percent. Only six other states have a higher percentage of state and local taxes coming from businesses.

Other significant revenue sources from New Hampshire's business community include the unemployment insurance tax, communications tax, insurance premium tax and rooms and meals tax. Some studies even suggest New Hampshire's business tax climate is among the worst in the country. A recent analysis from the Tax Foundation noted specifically that New Hampshire's poorest-in-the-nation ranking was due to our high BPT rate combined with the BET, a business tax unique to New Hampshire. A reasonable person can disagree with this ranking, but one thing is clear -- New Hampshire businesses are already providing more than their fair share of government tax revenue.

The Business and Industry Association (New Hampshire's statewide chamber of commerce) recently organized seven legislative plant tours. Manufacturing and high-tech companies with operations in New Hampshire and other parts of the country, or world, hosted the tours. More than 60 state legislators participated in the tours. Our primary motivation in organizing the tours was to help educate and sensitize legislators to the real challenges these companies, and all New Hampshire businesses, face.

The plant tours illustrated that, in addition to high business taxes, New Hampshire employers often absorb higher health care, energy and labor costs relative to locations outside the state. The current recession makes these disparities starker. And, unfortunately for New Hampshire, manufacturing and high technology companies -- the most important piece of the state's economy in terms of employment, wages and overall contribution to gross state product -- have never had more lower-cost options around the globe for locating their facilities than they do today.

Decisions the governor and state Senate and House members make during the 2009 legislative session concerning business taxes, energy initiatives and health care costs will, for many companies, determine whether they keep the lights on and people employed, file for bankruptcy, or simply expand or relocate somewhere else.

New Hampshire businesses, along with the hundreds of thousands of working men and women they employ, are counting on our elected leaders to consider the impact their decisions will have on employers and New Hampshire's economy during this difficult economic time. We are counting on our elected leaders to do no harm.

Jim Roche is president and CEO of the Business and Industry Association.

YOUR COMMENTS


If higher taxes scare business people away, then why do so many New Hampshire people have to commute to "Taxachusetts" to find decent work?
- Fran Taylor, Nashua NH

Excellent article Jim.

Perhaps the newly elected legislature with its Democrat majority could take a revolutionary que from their own President O'Bama and CUT taxes for both businesses and individuals.

History has proven time and again when you cut taxes economic growth expands.

Wouldn't it be grand if bucolic little New Hampshire was the spark that got this great nation back on its feet?
- Bob Dufresne, Nashua

Balancing the budget is a simple task. Spend less. Problem solved.
- Peter, Pembroke NH

Unfortunately the business community has too often gone along with the expansion of government in NH so they should not be surprised now that the bills are coming do. I cant remember the last time the business community to a strong stad against expanding government or taxation.
- Deiter, Portsmouth

This article points out that businesses in NH, " in addition to high business taxes, New Hampshire employers often absorb higher health care, energy and labor costs relative to locations outside the state. I am curious why that is so.
- Suasn, pelham

Great article. NH used to be a no nonsense state with few unnecessary government programs. The state seems to be moving into a very liberal direction, one that mirrors Mass. With that the cost of living increases for everyone. This article points out that our state leaders need to be careful with continuing with the notion to step on our businesses (small and large) to support so many state funded programs. There was a good editorial in yesterdays paper noting that the state needs to find alternative funding and hopefully it is not another tax to hurt the state's citizens.
- Henz, Merrimack

NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)