Repealing "Don't ask, don't tell" may be the right thing to do, but there's only one reason to do it: military effectiveness.
Reader comments: 12
Didn't that Manchester bank robber last week know that if you are going to rob a bank on Elm Street, ManchVegas, you are supposed to tape a tree to your head?
More Columns >>>
- > You never know about the mail (2)
- > Caroline Baum: We might as well be building pyramids (16)
- > Jonah Goldberg: Obama not ideological? Don't make me laugh (26)
- > Shackling our future to our elderly (12)
- > Thomas Sowell: Politicians in Wonderland (22)
- > John Clayton: For most writers, this is THE list
- > Gaming the abortion debate (32)
- > Joe McQuaid: Washington reigns supreme, but the Granite State has a few notables, too (8)
- > Some things never change, just the voices (4)
- > Fergus Cullen: Cronyism and corporate welfare rule RGGI grants (17)
- > George F. Will: The Democrats' two brains (18)
- > Is free speech merely a privilege? (25)
- > Thomas Sowell: An active electorate is a powerful electorate (16)
- > Pat Buchanan: Is Obama losing the white vote? (24)
- > Joe McQuaid: Virtual reality makes winter bearable for golfers stuck in its snowy grip (5)
Jim Rubens: NH Republicans, don't be fooled by Mitt Romney
By JIM RUBENS
Thursday, Dec. 27, 2007
WARNINGS ARE written like a billboard all over Mitt Romney. He has used his fortune to buy the most transparently shameless act of political plastic surgery I've ever seen. His blatant flip flops on a laundry list of key issues are pure calculation to win conservative votes. His loose regard for truth puts him in league with Bill and Hillary Clinton.
To measure Mitt Romney's allegiance to our party, look no further than the words of top Massachusetts Republicans who have seen him in operation over four years.
Former Massachusetts Gov. Paul Cellucci, former state treasurer Joe Malone, former state GOP Chairman Jim Rappaport and three of Massachusetts' five Republican state senators all oppose Mitt Romney (and support Rudy Giuliani, as I do). "I think a lot of people in the state definitely feel abandoned," said Senate Republican leader Richard Tisei. "Gov. Romney spent three of the four years of his governorship out of state running for President."
In 2006, Massachusetts Republicans did not even run candidates in 130 of 200 legislative seats and in seven of 10 congressional districts. The Green-Rainbow Party put up more candidates for statewide office than Republicans. "The Massachusetts Republican Party died last Tuesday [Nov. 7, 2006] . . . In lieu of flowers, send messages to New Hampshire Republican voters warning them about a certain presidential candidate named Romney," editorialized the Boston Herald.
Consider the timing of Mitt Romney's flips: are they evidence of late-blooming enlightenment or political calculation?
-- Illegal Immigration. In a November 30, 2005, interview with The Boston Globe, Romney called the elements of the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill "reasonable proposals." By March 2007, finger to the wind, Romney was roundly denouncing the same bill.
-- Casino gambling. Campaigning for governor in 2002, Mitt Romney indicated his support for slots casinos in Massachusetts. He flipped on Sept. 16, 2005, when Iowa conservatives threatened to boycott his campaign fundraisers.
-- Abortion. In his 2002 governor's race, Romney's platform stated, "The choice to have an abortion is a deeply personal one. Women should be free to choose based on their own beliefs, not the government's." In a July 26, 2005, Boston Globe op-ed, Romney wrote, "I am pro-life. I believe that abortion is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. . . . I believe that the states . . . should determine their own abortion laws."
-- Gay and lesbian issues. "We must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern," Romney wrote in 1994. Romney promised to outdo Ted Kennedy by winning "full equality" for gays and lesbians, by opposing a federal constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, and by advocating gays serving openly in the military. During his 2002 campaign for governor, Romney distributed flyers at a gay pride parade reaffirming his support. Then, on Dec. 14, 2006, Mitt Romney announced his flip on gay issues in an interview with National Review.
-- Global warming. On Nov. 7, 2005, Gov. Romney touted the 30 months and half a million dollars his administration had spent shaping the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which will reduce global warming gas pollution by 10 percent by 2019. "I'm convinced it is good business," said Romney. On Dec. 14, 2005, one hour before clearing the way for his presidential ambitions by announcing that he would not run again for governor, Mitt Romney abruptly pulled Massachusetts out of the agreement, saying it would be bad for business.
-- Health care mandate. In 2005, Gov. Romney proposed and in 2006 signed into law an under-funded universal health care plan, including a mandate that all individuals lacking it buy health insurance, substantially similar to Hillary Clinton's proposed plan. On the stump in 2007, Romney reversed and now opposes his own plan and its central feature, the insurance mandate.
Republicans willing to grant Romney a full pass on his litany of flips may be more disturbed by his slick treatment of the truth. For example: "I've been a hunter pretty much all my life," Romney told a gun rights activist in Keene in April. It turns out Romney has hunted only twice in his life, once when he was 15 and again at 60.
Likewise, earlier this year, Romney said, "I have a gun of my own." When questioned two days later, he admitted that, while his son owned a gun, he did not.
And finally, "My father and I marched with Martin Luther King Jr. through the streets of Detroit," Romney told The Boston Globe in 1978. The story was adjusted as of December 2007, when he said that he "saw" his father march with MLK. Both claims are false. In attempting to explain his way out, Mitt Romney turns ominously Clintonian: "If you look at the literature, if you look at the dictionary, the term 'saw' includes being aware of in the sense I've described."
It is impossible to determine what Mitt Romney believes. He cannot be trusted to stick with his promises or positions on the major issues. If Republicans allow Mitt Romney to win on Jan. 8, we will have abjectly failed our single most persuasive claim to the first primary: that we are scrupulous in uncovering the real candidate and that we cannot be fooled.
Jim Rubens is a former chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party platform committee and was a state senator from 1994 to 1998.

.jpg)





Andrew Cline has been editorial page editor of the New Hampshire Union Leader since October of 2001. His writing has appeared in more than 100 newspapers and magazines, including The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and National Review.
Print
Email
Mobile
Reader comments
YOUR COMMENTS
This man sounds like he is having a temper tantrum. How come when Mitt Romney changes positions on a handful of issues, he is a "flip-flopper," but John McCain does the same its because of "conviction." McCain backed off his amnesty for illegals bill when it became unpopular. He despised Jerry Falwell and the evangelical leaders until last year when he decided he needed their help. He "took on" the NRA--until this year. His signature campaign finance law has been a total disaster. Governor Romney has excellent credentials and qualifications to be president, and he reflects the mainstream republican views of Ronald Reagan, despite whatever hit-pieces by liberals and liberal republicans are written.
- dan fischer, glen burnie, md
Mr. Rubens has a lot more to learn when it comes to analyzing Mitt Romney. I don’t have time to rebuttal all the erroneous claims made about Governor Romney in this piece, but I’ll make a few points.
1. True, Mitt Romney has pumped a lot of his own money into the race, but is everyone forgetting that he has raised more money than any other GOP hopeful?
2. All this baloney from the anti-Romney republicans about him being a flip-flopper is a bunch of bunk. Mitt has thoroughly explained his reasoning (like Reagan, Henry Hyde, and George H. W. Bush) why he changed his political position on abortion. All the other accusations about Mitt changing his position are fundamentally untrue. Mr. Ruben has taken these one-line sound bites and misrepresented Mitt’s quotes.
3. Mitt is not phony. Talk to anyone that knows him personally.
What GOP voters need to look at are the issues where he is dramatically different from the other candidates. Romney’s managerial experience is unmatched. His leadership experience is unmatched. His education is unmatched. His understanding of the economy and business is unmatched. Anyone that does their homework will realize that he is simply the best choice in 08.
- Dan Carlile, Provo, UT
To Mr. Rubens: The reason NH has the first primary is that it is an excellent sounding board to determine which lies a gullible electorate will believe. Saves time for real campaigning later in states that matter.
- Leo Paradis, Canterbury
Lawrence from NY says the only reason for a liberal Republican to mistrust Romney's bipolar political positioning is fear that his changes are genuine. If only that was the sole thing to fear. The danger is not that Romney has now become a true conservative - it's that Romney is a changeling who shifts positions for his own political benefit. His positions are not informed by his own integrity or ideals - so what happens when the winds blow in a direction not matching his current supporters' ideals? He'll drop them and kow-tow to whomever can keep him in office.
I don't believe he is truly liberal, conversative or anything definitive in between. He is a political shill that becomes whatever he needs to be in order to win elections, and that should drive any thinking voter in the opposite direction.
- Suzanne Gale, Concord, NH
Unfortunately, there's not a true conservative in the Republican fold. Any of these sorts of criticisms can be leveled at any of the other Reagan wannabes. That all of them have apparently capitulated to the man-made global warming hoax and are willing to see our economy ruined in a quixotic attempt to "fix" what we cannot change, i.e. the climate, speaks volumes about the current state of the Republican party.
- Peter Anderson, Warner, NH
Does Rubens oppose Romney because Romney's many flips to conservative positions show Romney to be insincere? Or does Rubens oppose Romney because Romney flipped to CONSERVATIVE positions?
Think about it. The people who logically ought to be concerned about the genuineness of Romney's many changes to conservative positions are conservatives: "Can we trust this guy? Or is he just a liberal pretending to be conservative?" But for a social liberal like Rubens (and being a Giuliani supporter he is by definition a social liberal) to oppose Romney over his supposedly insincere changes to conservative positions makes no sense. If Romney's changes to conservatism are insincere, then he's still a liberal, and the liberal ought to feel that Romney is still on the liberal side, notwithstanding his blatantly insincere appeal to conservatives. The only reason for a liberal Republican such as Rubens to oppose and denounce Romney so strongly over his changes to conservative positions is that Rubens believes the changes are GENUINE.
- Lawrence Auster, New York, New York
NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)