Site Search
To add or update your business directory listing, click here.
► Accommodations
► Activities
► Contractors & Builders
► Dining
► Financial Services
► Gift Shops
► Health Clubs & Fitness
► Insurance
► Legal Services
► Medical Services
► NH Products
Retired general backs Clinton on Iraq
By JOHN DISTASO
Senior Political Reporter
Saturday, Oct. 6, 2007
A retired U.S. Army general visiting the state to campaign for Hillary Clinton said yesterday she does not oppose the Iraq war -- and she said she's never heard Clinton oppose it, either.
Retired Lt. Gen. Claudia Kennedy, the Army's first woman to reach the three-star rank, said she supports Clinton's promise to withdraw the majority of U.S. troops from Iraq if she is elected President. But Kennedy said she does not consider her position to be opposing the war as it is currently being conducted.
Kennedy, 60, retired in 2000 after serving in the Army since 1969.
Asked if she opposes the war as it is currently being conducted, Kennedy said in a telephone interview: "As of the last couple of years, I do think that we should be on a different track. I wouldn't put it that way because, as retired military, it might come across as being -- you know what I mean -- I wouldn't say it in a completely stark way.
"I'm very proud of the army," Kennedy said. "I'm proud of the Army leadership. They've done the very best they can given the circumstances. They get a shifting sense of mission and it comes from their civilian leadership. They haven't gotten the support they needed."
Kennedy said she agreed with Clinton's position to withdraw, as Clinton has said, "the vast majority" of U.S. troops from Iraq while leaving behind a relatively small counter-terrorism force.
"Senator Clinton has it exactly right," said Kennedy. "If she is elected, her plan is to bring together the chairman of the joint chiefs, the Secretary of Defense and the National Security Council and get them to create a plan that will have the withdrawal begin within 60 days."
Kennedy said she does not consider such a position opposition to the war.
"I'm from the Vietnam era, and in the Vietnam era, we were very cut-and-dried," Kennedy said. "You were for the war or against the war, and being against the war was, 'Hell, no, I won't go.' I don't buy into that one single bit.
"The reality is, here we are now," she said. "We have got to be responsible in the way we transition from war to just being in support of the Iraqis in some less prominent way; some way that gets us out of the neighborhood and being in between opposing internal forces. It's not our job to sort out their civil conflict. They are the only ones with the authority to fix it. You can go in any time you want to as a third country, but it will never get fixed by you. People in their own country have got to do it."
Kennedy said, "I don't oppose the war. I think it's being very badly led by the civilian leadership." And, she added, "I have not ever heard (Clinton) say, 'I oppose the war.' I've heard her say that we need to begin withdrawal under a plan led by the military and defense secretary. I've heard her say we need to create a regional stabilizing group by allies, by leaders in the world and by all of the states that are bordering Iraq. That is a very important idea and the point of that group is to create incentive and assurances that will keep the neighboring countries from becoming involved and entering Iraq. That's a much more sophisticated thing than saying, 'I oppose the war.'"
Kennedy said she does not believe that her position and Clinton's is damaging to troop morale.
"I'll tell you this," Kennedy said. "It's terrible for morale for soldiers to think they are fighting a war when they themselves don't know why they are there. They can be given all kinds of really good leadership and good leaders can hold them together at the immediate level. But long-term, it's a betrayal of our soldiers to send them to war with reasons that keep shifting on the basis of apparently pretty deceptive reasoning and lying to the public by the Republican administration. That is not good for morale at all.
"It doesn't make me less patriotic if I don't think George Bush is on track," Kennedy said. "I would think that is the worst thing for morale, and it has nothing to do with what Claudia Kennedy, retired general, thinks. Morale for soldiers has nothing to do with the internal domestic politics of this country. When they're in Iraq, they're trying to complete their mission successfully and they're trying to stay alive, and make sure their buddies are alive. What a retired general in the U.S. says, first of all, is probably unknown to them and it's not of interest."
They think that no matter who's talking over here in the U.S., we're out of touch with their reality."

.jpg)

Print
Email
Mobile
Reader comments
YOUR COMMENTS
I was able to solidify my opinion of the upcoming NH congressional elections simply
by noting Mr. Hodge’s and Mrs. Shea Porter vote on the stimulus package. They chose to exclude Seniors on Social Security and Disable Veterans, how sad. They also applauded Nancy Pelosi for leaving out these very needed people. Mr. Hodge and Mrs. Shea Porter should realize that senior citizen have to eat, pay rent and sometimes buy clothes. I gladly would give up my rebate to secure rebates Seniors and Disable Vets. I suggest all Seniors and Veterans remember this when the time to vote comes around and don’t be dissuaded when they apply their SPIN to this sad, sad blemish on their records. I know they must follow Nancy and they do, religiously, but this was really for a segment of the population that really has a life or death need, how could they be so heartless. Where is Jeb Bradley when we really need him? Also many, many thanks to Senator Sununu for getting the inclusion of the Seniors and Disabled Veterns in the rebate. We won’t forget come voting day. By the way I continue to support Governor Lynch and hope he can solve the deficit problem without increasing taxes.
- Paul Reihms, Bedford
Somebody handed the General the wrong script. That one's from 2004. Not surprised the General's confused, so are a lot of us. Hillary included!
- Joe Mathews, Manchester, VT
Hey Tim...You might want to see a few of the other officers supporting Democratic candidates...Gen. Merrill McPeak - a fighter pilot during Vietnam and former Air Force Chief of Staff - supports Sen. Obama, just for one off-the-top example.
I could bore everyone with the list of which general supports which candidate, but for to slur a woman who served her country for three decades with your snide little "combat arms" reference is typical cowardly lion nonsense - a lot of roar, with no manliness behind it.
Be careful when you switch your TV between the Sox, Patriots and Fox News tomorrow...that's a lot of strenuous effort on your body, after all. My God, you could be killed.
- Steve, Epping, NH
Senator Clinton opposes this war and is trying to do everything she can to end it as quickly as she can -- a goal that she and General Kennedy share.
- Kathleen Strand, Manchester, NH
This is why women are not allowed in combat arms.
- Tim Moore, Barnstead
This is yet another political ploy to pander to NH by the very cunning Ms Clinton. We all know that there is no Democrat running who intends to pull out the troops and none who did not vote to send them there in the first place.
If you really want the troops pulled out, there is only one person to vote for and that is Ron Paul. He will do what he says.
He is the candidate who has had the MOST donations from current military including those serving in Iraq. It's a fact perhaps the UL won't publish, but is nevertheless true.
- Jane Aitken, Bedford
NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)