Supporters of Congress' proposed government takeover of health care, including Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, have taken to claiming that they are on "the right side of history."
If you've ever wondered just how out of touch university faculty can get, look no further than the behavior of the University of New Hampshire's faculty union during its recent contract talks.
More Editorials >>>
- > Right on rights: Obama gives hope in China (23)
- > How about spending? An elephant forgets (10)
- > Tobacco shakedown: It's not 'for the children' (19)
- > Social blunders: Our President the yokel (69)
- > Board benefits: Nix health coverage (8)
- > The KSM trial: War? What war? (51)
- > Owned: You belong to Nancy Pelosi (70)
- > Paying for officers: Gatsas gets it right (16)
- > No guarantees: Eagle Times subsidy is wrong (34)
- > Abortion extremism: Shaheen falls on the far left (48)
- > Culture clash: Old NH meets new NH (5)
- > Dump Hackett Hill: It's a public money pit (4)
- > Unsung citizens: They say 'thanks' for us all (8)
- > A new right: Access to abortion funds (55)
- > Default or pay? Arena rock and a hard place (16)
Swine flu follies: Don't test, we already know!
Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009
CAN WE BLAME President Obama for the swine flu? Well, not exactly, unless someone comes up with pictures of him mutating viruses a year before he was elected.
But the way the U.S. government has been handling the new flu strain, technically named H1N1, has been less than reassuring and if the buck stops for anything at the Oval Office, it certainly should be for matters of public health.
We thought it odd when word came last summer that the federal government was advising states to stop testing for and tracking individual cases of the swine flu. The rationale given by the federal Centers for Disease Control? We already know this is going to be an epidemic, so don't waste your time and resources confirming what we know.
This don't-confuse-us-with-the-facts attitude piqued the curiosity of CBS News. Last week, it reported that the decision to stop testing is highly questionable in two important ways.
First, CBS went back and asked the individual states for the results of tests taken BEFORE the CDC no-test advisory. "The vast majority of cases were negative for H1N1 as well as seasonal flu," CBS reported, "despite the fact that many states were specifically testing patients deemed to be most likely to have H1N1, based on symptoms and risk factors, such as travel to Mexico."
So the size and scope of this flu epidemic may not have been as great as the government initially thought. But here comes the second questionable result of the no-test policy.
"Once you have H1N1 flu," CBS noted, "you're immune from future outbreaks of the same virus. Those who think they've had H1N1 flu -- but haven't -- might mistakenly presume they're immune. As a result, they might skip taking a vaccine that could help them, and expose themselves to others with H1N1 flu under the mistaken belief they won't catch it. Parents might not keep sick children home from school, mistakenly believing they've already had H1N1 flu."
Meanwhile, there have been problems with manufacturing sufficient quantities of vaccines for both seasonal and swine flu, in part because the drug companies switched over to the swine-flu vaccine production because of an epidemic that the government decided was coming, available evidence to the contrary notwithstanding. And now that epidemic is coming, although if we don't test for it, how will we know?
But at least we all know how to sneeze correctly and wash our hands because President Obama showed us.
.jpg)



Andrew Cline has been editorial page editor of the New Hampshire Union Leader since October of 2001. His writing has appeared in more than 100 newspapers and magazines, including The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and National Review.
Reader comments