Respecting the rights of all means that I respect your right not to eat meat or to eat meat from a supermarket and not to hunt. I expect the same respect.
Democrats' health bills depend on forcing individuals to buy insurance or face severe fines or imprisonment.
More Columns >>>
- > Charles M. Arlinghaus: The new health care bureaucracy (18)
- > Kathy Sulivan: Don't read too much into recent election results (18)
- > Joe McQuaid: Not to be outdone, the Granite State must have a fossil to call its own (8)
- > Two stories for the book on hunting (7)
- > Fergus Cullen: Is Lamontagne too good for politics? (6)
- > Garth Corriveau: Time to deliver better government for Manchester (19)
- > Douglas J. Wenners: Congress' proposed reforms will raise health insurance rates (35)
- > Charles M. Arlinghaus: City's revenue sharing loss was inevitable (12)
- > Deroy Murdock: Pelosi's health care bill is the nanny state run amok (31)
- > Joe McQuaid: Contemplating a misplaced grandkid, Kathleen Parker's visit
- > John Clayton: Dad takes on 'Naked Baby Syndrome' (14)
- > John Harrigan: We can't let this go without a challenge (21)
- > Greg Moore: Tuesday's message from voters: Butt out, party bosses (8)
- > Kathleen Parker: Saving the news (11)
- > Grace Mattern: Domestic violence is a bigger problem than many realize (9)
Thompson's 'gatekeepers' hurt his campaign
By ROBERT D. NOVAK
Thursday, Sep. 13, 2007
ALMOST IMMEDIATELY after the launch of Fred Thompson's long anticipated presidential candidacy, important neutral Republicans decreed privately that it had crashed and burned on takeoff. Many of these critics had wanted to board the Thompson campaign but were repelled by his "gatekeepers." That helps explain their attitude now, and not merely because of bruised feelings caused by their exclusion.
Thompson's burial, nevertheless, is premature. The conditions persist that caused him, an actor supposedly finished with politics, to emerge suddenly in March as his party's potential savior. The leading Republican contestants -- Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney and John McCain -- all have a glass jaw in the view of neutral Republican Mike Murphy (though Murphy says Thompson does as well). The Republican electorate is still looking for the forceful, dynamic conservative that many have thought Thompson might be.

Failure to utilize the last six months to craft an inspirational, exciting Thompson campaign can be partly explained by the exclusionist attitude by old friends and political professionals in possession of his candidacy. An example of who was excluded is Scott Reed, who ran Bob Dole's 1996 campaign and is regarded as one of Washington's keener political minds. He had contributed to McCain but had not committed to him and was ready to join Thompson's team. Reed would provide Thompson with one experienced political manager who knows how to nominate a Republican for President.
Reed participated in one private meeting with Thompson, but got no further. Three separate sources told me that the gatekeeper who excluded Reed was Mary Matalin, a longtime Republican operative dating back to George H.W. Bush's campaigns. She is a Washington insider who does not espouse the social conservative views that Thompson is expected to project by those Republicans in search of a nominee. Matalin did not return my telephone call.
Jeff Bell, an innovative conservative theoretician whose experience goes back to Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, also wanted to help Thompson. His expertise could be invaluable for a candidate trying to fill the Reagan niche. Bell did not even get as far as a meeting with Thompson, though one was scheduled, abruptly canceled and then not rescheduled. What gatekeeper kept out Bell is unknown, but he was involved in a dispute many years ago with Ken Rietz, a Republican activist who was in charge of putting together Thompson's campaign.
These are not isolated cases, but other Washington insiders who were repelled at the Thompson gates do not want the embarrassment of having their names published. One Republican activist, who excels as both a policy wonk and fund-raiser, has repeatedly offered himself to Thompson -- without a response. A high-level Bush administration official, with experience in politics and finance, has sent Thompson one resume after another -- without a response.
The constricted Thompson circle may explain early shortcomings. Failing to perform opposition research on himself, Thompson has been taken by surprise by the dissection of his career. No new initiatives accompanied the unveiling of his candidacy. To skip the Sept. 5 debate in Durham, N.H., while announcing his candidacy on Jay Leno's television program, was a startling affront to New Hampshire.
Thompson's great asset remains the collective glass jaw of his opponents. Giuliani is not only a social liberal in a socially conservative party but is burdened with a life story that makes Democrats tremble with anticipation. Romney, who has transformed himself from liberal to conservative on social issues, to many Republicans seems a multi-millionaire investment banker willing to make any deal (though his biggest problem with evangelicals and strict Catholics is his Mormon religion). McCain seemed his old feisty self in the Sept. 5 debate, but on ABC's "This Week" last Sunday, he came over as melancholy. So, there is still a void. But can Thompson fill it?
Robert D. Novak is a Washington political columnist and commentator on FOX News.

.jpg)




Andrew Cline has been editorial page editor of the New Hampshire Union Leader since October of 2001. His writing has appeared in more than 100 newspapers and magazines, including The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and National Review.
Print
Email
Mobile
Reader comments
YOUR COMMENTS
Paul, it may be a new day, etc etc. But Mary Matalin is hardly a new face. She blew the election for Bush-41. Then she became James Carvile's husband. Then she worked for Dick Cheney in the VP office. Then she became a K Street lobbyist. That's not exactly new blood or new thinking. With help like that, Thompson's campaign will soon crash and burn. And if what I'm hearing about his views on supply side economics [he will exhort us to "get real" on taxes -- as he raises them] is true, it will be good riddance.
- Frank, Apex, NC
Mr. Novak doesn't get it. Using the same old game plan (and people) doesn't work.
It's a new day, requiring new ideas, and new strategies...ask the newspapers.
- Paul, Redondo Beach, CA
Really, Mark? What facts, I pray you tell, are assumed or incorrect? Mr. Novak is famous for writing sound factual stories, while analyzing those facts in the form of an editorial column. If your are going to call someone a donkey, you better make direct reference to the facts (or lack thereof) that place them into that non-rational animal species.
- Joe Geiger, Merrimack
This is more of a propaganda piece than one based on all the facts. Assumption makes this author look like an A--. If you don't know something fully don't pretend you do just to make others look bad. Get your facts straight first, than make an assessment.
- Mark, Bedford, NH
NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)