Home » Opinion » Editorials
A Kerry-Obama scam: Another Obamacare fleecing
Here is yet another in the never-ending list of surprises to emerge from Obamacare: It skews Medicare hospital reimbursements in favor of Massachusetts hospitals and in disfavor of most other states, The Boston Globe and the Associated Press reported last week.
It was disclosed only last week that Sen. John Kerry inserted a provision into Obamacare that changed Medicare reimbursements for hospital pay. Nantucket Cottage Hospital has higher than average pay because it’s a critical access care hospital on the island of Nantucket. Under Kerry’s provision, Medicare must use the Nantucket Cottage Hospital’s pay scale when reimbursing all Massachusetts hospitals for employee pay. The Globe reported that Massachusetts hospitals will rake in an extra $275 million a year from the change.
But here’s the catch. Obamacare required no net increase in those reimbursement payments. So to give Massachusetts that extra $275 million a year, it had to be taken from hospitals in other states. According to the AP, seven states (including New Hampshire) will see higher payments, but every other state will lose money.
It is a massive wealth transfer from the rest of the country to those seven states, just so Sen. Kerry can grease the palms of his state’s hospital executives.
It is no wonder that President Obama doesn’t want people to know the details of his policies (see editorial above) or that Sen. Kerry, as he said last Friday on MSNBC, doesn’t want the media to air the opinions of Tea Partiers and others who disagree with him.
The more ignorant Obama and Kerry can keep you, the better their political fortunes.
It was disclosed only last week that Sen. John Kerry inserted a provision into Obamacare that changed Medicare reimbursements for hospital pay. Nantucket Cottage Hospital has higher than average pay because it’s a critical access care hospital on the island of Nantucket. Under Kerry’s provision, Medicare must use the Nantucket Cottage Hospital’s pay scale when reimbursing all Massachusetts hospitals for employee pay. The Globe reported that Massachusetts hospitals will rake in an extra $275 million a year from the change.
But here’s the catch. Obamacare required no net increase in those reimbursement payments. So to give Massachusetts that extra $275 million a year, it had to be taken from hospitals in other states. According to the AP, seven states (including New Hampshire) will see higher payments, but every other state will lose money.
It is a massive wealth transfer from the rest of the country to those seven states, just so Sen. Kerry can grease the palms of his state’s hospital executives.
It is no wonder that President Obama doesn’t want people to know the details of his policies (see editorial above) or that Sen. Kerry, as he said last Friday on MSNBC, doesn’t want the media to air the opinions of Tea Partiers and others who disagree with him.
The more ignorant Obama and Kerry can keep you, the better their political fortunes.
- Killing CON: Pull the plug now - 8
- Fled to Singapore: Not alone, either - 32
- Tech education: NH moves forward - 2
- Bloody boondoggle: Rhode Island's Schilling deal - 8
- What's in a name? 'A baby that has not yet been born' - 9
- Granny D Day? A step too far - 5
- Congress' bank: Corporate welfare lives - 15
- Claremont's center: Rejected generosity? - 0
- House decorum: Bluster and blame - 15
Unfair trade: Obama stalls, China wins
READER COMMENTS: 0- Brookline hires selectman as town administrator - 0
- Beavers creating Littleton road flooding problems - 0
- Hooksett’s new trash system ready to start in early June - 0
- Goffstown TV coordinator quits to take Nashua job - 0
- Manchester’s new tech high school to pick first class via lottery - 0
- Candidate takes aim over health care competition - 0
- Hikel apologizes to state GOP vice chair over ‘stupid’ remarks - 0
- Newfound Regional district teacher jobs cut follow budget - 0
- Manchester teen pleads innocent in assault, has issue with bail - 0
Plaistow teen dies on beach in Scotland
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available


