Home » Opinion » Editorials
Gregg's revenge: Killing the CLASS Act
When former Sen. Judd Gregg smelled something wrong with federal budget numbers, something was probably very wrong indeed. So it is no surprise to us that an important part of Obamacare died last week because of a hunch Gregg had about its financial sustainability.
Among Obamacare's multitude of offerings was something called the CLASS Act, a program created by Ted Kennedy to provide long-term care benefits to Americans. Kennedy wanted the federal government to give people long-term care benefits (such as paying for nursing home care) in exchange for small premium payments. The program was not to be subsidized, but was to be funded entirely by premium payments.
Of course, private insurers already offer such services. But to make sure they don't go bankrupt, insurers use underwriting, meaning that rates rise with age, and already sick people either pay higher rates or are denied coverage. Kennedy didn't like that. So the law would let anyone, regardless of age or health status, sign up for CLASS.
Gregg figured that would be unsustainable. So he got an amendment inserted into the bill that required CLASS to be certified as actuarily sound (meaning it fully paid for itself) for 75 years before it could start. But that was impossible, and the program was killed.
That's a big deal because the Congressional Budget Office scored CLASS as reducing the federal deficit by $86 billion over 10 years. The CBO is not allowed to score a program beyond a decade. Gregg's amendment required a 75-year projection. That confirmed what the CBO could not: CLASS was a financial fraud.
If House Republicans want a good issue with which to fight Obamacare going into this next election, they should push to have the whole Affordable Care Act scored as CLASS was. It won't pass, but Democrats will have to explain why they oppose it, which will be useful as well as entertaining.
- Just say it: Our fight is with radical Islam - 70
- Ignorance abounds: Obamacare and small businesses - 25
- Mayor development: Growth and a Manchester city office - 1
- Page One Editorial: Control of NH’s future: Today’s House vote will be one for the ages - 17
- Consider Nevada: Gambling always expands - 9
- Missing the point: The IRS scandal and state power - 27
- Helping panhandlers: A method worth trying in Manchester - 7
- For the people: A century of the NH primary - 0
- What innovation? The casino way is the lazy way - 10
The casino vote: The House did its duty
READER COMMENTS: 11- Garry Rayno's State House Dome: Will House, Senate continue the feud? - 1
- Ted Siefer's City Hall: City down to the wire on school budget, superintendent - 0
- Service planned for mother of Newtown school shooter - 0
- ENH Power parent firm accused of false advertising - 0
- Soldier from Pelham remembered for self-sacrifice - 0
- New Hampshire energy suppliers announce new alliance - 0
- Mont Vernon murder mastermind drops appeal, citing 'personal and moral' reasons - 0
- Ian Clark's On Hockey: Are B's destiny's darlings? - 0
- Dave D'Onofrio's Sox Beat: Lackey's performance key for Sox - 0



