Home » Opinion » Editorials
Compact waste: HB 1560 is frivolous
While the Senate prepares to debate a bill (SB 150) that would make a serious stab at improving our health insurance options in New Hampshire, the House holds a public hearing today on a bill that has pretensions of doing the same, but which suffers from delusions of grandeur.
House Bill 1560 is a strange, convoluted attempt to relieve New Hampshire of the burdens imposed by federal health care dictates. The bill would establish the foundation for a multi-state health care compact. The compact’s rules would allow all member states to “suspend by legislation the operation of all federal laws, rules, regulations, and orders regarding health care that are inconsistent with the laws and regulations adopted by the member state pursuant to this compact” so the states can regulate health care as they see fit.
There are only two, teeny problems. First, Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution forbids states from entering into compacts without the consent of Congress. HB 1560 thereby requests that Congress allow the creation of this compact. Second, Article 6 states that federal laws are the supreme law of the land. HB 1560 has no answer for that one.
Then the coup de grace: HB 1560 declares that states in the compact have a “right” to direct payments “funded by Congress as mandatory spending” to implement, presumably, their own health care laws. The idea that Congress would approve a multi-state compact that lets states ignore federal laws but keep all money intended to implement those laws is preposterous. This bill is a frivolity upon which legislators should not waste their time.
House Bill 1560 is a strange, convoluted attempt to relieve New Hampshire of the burdens imposed by federal health care dictates. The bill would establish the foundation for a multi-state health care compact. The compact’s rules would allow all member states to “suspend by legislation the operation of all federal laws, rules, regulations, and orders regarding health care that are inconsistent with the laws and regulations adopted by the member state pursuant to this compact” so the states can regulate health care as they see fit.
There are only two, teeny problems. First, Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution forbids states from entering into compacts without the consent of Congress. HB 1560 thereby requests that Congress allow the creation of this compact. Second, Article 6 states that federal laws are the supreme law of the land. HB 1560 has no answer for that one.
Then the coup de grace: HB 1560 declares that states in the compact have a “right” to direct payments “funded by Congress as mandatory spending” to implement, presumably, their own health care laws. The idea that Congress would approve a multi-state compact that lets states ignore federal laws but keep all money intended to implement those laws is preposterous. This bill is a frivolity upon which legislators should not waste their time.
- Mixed city report card: An 'A' and an 'incomplete' - 2
- 50 years after Glenn: Let's hear it for space exploration - 25
- Fire politics: Choices in Manchester - 35
- Contract hunting: Ban would harm property owners - 14
- Jefferson on Washington: ‘A wise, a good, and a great man’ - 18
- Right path for NH House: Pass the funding amendment - 16
- Limiting taxes: It's constitutional - 19
- Hospital competition: Rethinking its regulation - 14
- Hooksett's hall: Will the town preserve it? - 1
Hold your liquor: Grocery bill too much, too fast
READER COMMENTS: 0- Only in Print: Nashua may add preschool classes - 0
- BearCat brouhaha revs up Keene - 0
- Contracts approved for refugee resettlement groups - 0
- Monarchs desperate for a win - 0
- Only in Print: Manchester officials step up healthy eating awareness efforts - 0
- Only in Print -- Veterans: Honoring the stars and stripes - 0
- Only in Print: Nashua Unitarian and Baptist choirs brought together through song - 0
- What's in a name? Manchester may never know - 0
- Two miscast candidates for the GOP - 0
Settlement designed to help troubled homeowners
READER COMMENTS: 1
Sorry, no question available


