Home » Opinion » Editorials
The casino change: What NH would become
It is ironic that Republicans are pushing casino gambling bills, as casinos would destroy the incentive for legislators to behave like Republicans.
The rationale for building casinos in New Hampshire shifts with the political winds. When education funding was the big issue of the day, casino bills were said to be focused on generating revenue for public schools. When balancing the state budget was a pressing concern, casino bills were supposed to achieve that. Today, everybody's top concerns are jobs and the economy. Guess what the backers of the new casino bill say it is all about?
“This bill is a bi-partisan pro business bill that will create jobs, grant tax relief, and provide the state with an additional revenue source,” reads the House Ways and Means Committee's majority report on House Bill 593. That bill would grant state licenses for two casinos in New Hampshire. If you believe that two slot-machine casinos are going to revive New Hampshire's economy, you're probably a casino industry lobbyist. Actually, even they don't really believe that. It's just what they're paid to say.
House Bill 593 is not about jobs. It's not about the economy. It's about one thing: creating a source of ready revenue for the state. But the state doesn't need that revenue, as some of the very people backing this bill have shown in the past year.
The Legislature's Republican majority did something truly remarkable last summer. It balanced the state budget by cutting spending rather than raising taxes. Legislators proved that the state could balance its books responsibly without raising revenue — and without casino gambling. If we bring in casinos, that work and the philosophy that achieved it will be undone.
Casinos would erase the discipline Republicans just imposed on the state budget, and any incentive to be disciplined in the future. We would go from a state that believes “low taxes are the result of low spending” to one that believes “low taxes are the result of lots of casinos.” It would be a permanent — and negative — change in New Hampshire's culture. All for money we don't need anyway.
The rationale for building casinos in New Hampshire shifts with the political winds. When education funding was the big issue of the day, casino bills were said to be focused on generating revenue for public schools. When balancing the state budget was a pressing concern, casino bills were supposed to achieve that. Today, everybody's top concerns are jobs and the economy. Guess what the backers of the new casino bill say it is all about?
“This bill is a bi-partisan pro business bill that will create jobs, grant tax relief, and provide the state with an additional revenue source,” reads the House Ways and Means Committee's majority report on House Bill 593. That bill would grant state licenses for two casinos in New Hampshire. If you believe that two slot-machine casinos are going to revive New Hampshire's economy, you're probably a casino industry lobbyist. Actually, even they don't really believe that. It's just what they're paid to say.
House Bill 593 is not about jobs. It's not about the economy. It's about one thing: creating a source of ready revenue for the state. But the state doesn't need that revenue, as some of the very people backing this bill have shown in the past year.
The Legislature's Republican majority did something truly remarkable last summer. It balanced the state budget by cutting spending rather than raising taxes. Legislators proved that the state could balance its books responsibly without raising revenue — and without casino gambling. If we bring in casinos, that work and the philosophy that achieved it will be undone.
Casinos would erase the discipline Republicans just imposed on the state budget, and any incentive to be disciplined in the future. We would go from a state that believes “low taxes are the result of low spending” to one that believes “low taxes are the result of lots of casinos.” It would be a permanent — and negative — change in New Hampshire's culture. All for money we don't need anyway.
- Curb your cougar: Manchester's animal control - 2
- Hiding public business: This time it's Wilton-Lyndeborough - 0
- Obama history: Watch out, Mt. Rushmore - 3
- Unfair trade: Obama stalls, China wins - 9
- Killing CON: Pull the plug now - 8
- Fled to Singapore: Not alone, either - 31
- Tech education: NH moves forward - 2
- Bloody boondoggle: Rhode Island's Schilling deal - 8
- What's in a name? 'A baby that has not yet been born' - 18
Saving America: Challenges for our students
READER COMMENTS: 0- New principal chosen for Alvirne High School - 0
- Papile gets 50 years to life for murder of Maine mother - 1
- Brawny plumbers, pipefitters clean up Valley Cemetery - 0
- Bedford council upholds zoning amendment vote - 0
- Woman, 26, sentenced for her part in burglary ring - 0
- Londonderry driver’s education contracts renewed - 0
- Derry assistant principals get board approval - 0
- Bear sightings shake up Salem - 0
- Londonderry adult ed program looks to expand - 0
Orphaned bear cubs caught in Moultonborough
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available


