Home » Opinion » Editorials
Giving to parks: It should be easier
New Hampshire's State Park System is striving to find new ways to remain self-funded. It is partnering with local and national businesses, accepting sponsorships, and reaching out to expand its base of volunteer workers. One thing it is not authorized by law to do? Accept donations.
Fortunately, the Senate votes today on a bill to change that. Senate Bill 237 would allow the state Division of Parks and Recreation to accept “gifts and donations.” The bill, requested by the Department of Resources and Economic Development, would allow the department to aggressively seek big-dollar donations for state parks, and thus relieve pressure on the department to ask for general fund appropriations.
The bill divides donations into two categories. Any donation of $2,500 or less could be accepted by the division directly. Any gift worth more than that would need to pass through the governor and Executive Council.
The Executive Council has to approve state contracts worth $10,000 or more, and personal service contracts worth $2,500 or more. The direct donation cutoff in SB 237 is consistent with the personal service contract cutoff. If it were raised to $10,000, though, that would encourage larger gifts. There is nothing quite like being forced through a bureaucratic and potentially political approval process to discourage donors from writing big checks.
The bill also ends the sunsets on DRED administrators' authority to make field purchases of up to $2,000. That authority expires at the end of this fiscal year; the bill would make it permanent.
SB 237 helps the State Park System help itself, which in turn helps park users and taxpayers — two groups that do not always overlap. It ought to have unanimous support.
READER COMMENTS: 1
- Heroes all? A word cheapened by overuse - 10
- Punch line: The NFL blows it - 3
- Distracted legislating: Our baseless cellphone ban - 37
- Workplace abuse: Governor gets one right - 0
- Fleeing hostile states: Gun makers will travel - 14
- Voting in NH: Not just for NH residents - 28
- Protesting information: Picket sign o' the times - 6
- Seabrook's message: No one above the law here - 3
- 'Economic patriotism'; tax rates and border jumpers - 6
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Motorist accused of having fake inspection sticker in Merrimack - 0
- Hudson man arrested in gunfire incident - 0
- Altherr homer in eighth sinks Fisher Cats in series opener - 0
- NH Shrine team girds for Vt.'s ground attack - 0
- On Baseball: Fishers prospects sweat out deadline day - 0
- Goffstown ready for LL regional tourney - 0
- Dave D'Onofrio's Sox Beat -- Message is clear: Offense needs boost - 0
- Marina dealers say boat sales are on the rise - 0
- Another View -- Gilles Bissonnette, William Christie, Alan Cronheim and Benjamin Siracusa Hillman: Why voting in NH is not reserved for state residents - 10
Havenstein says he has always opposed Obamacare, though company he led was paid to implement parts of it
Another View -- Gilles Bissonnette, William Christie, Alan Cronheim and Benjamin Siracusa Hillman: Why voting in NH is not reserved for state residents
Heroes all? A word cheapened by overuse
Market Basket customers mobilize
Mark Hayward's City Matters: Market Basket workers' outlook challenges the skeptics among us
Police held Abby suspect's guns
Punch line: The NFL blows it