Home » Opinion » Editorials
Hospital competition: Rethinking its regulation
Legislators are considering a bill that would allow for-profit cancer treatment centers to open in New Hampshire without having to clear two hurdles other medical centers have to leap. The bill would exempt these centers from the state's Certificate of Need law and Medicaid enhancement tax. Existing hospitals are hotly opposed, of course. They say such exemptions would give the newcomers an unfair competitive advantage.
That's a very interesting argument. Many of the hospitals whose executives make this assertion are themselves not-for-profit institutions. As such, they pay no property taxes and no state business taxes. (They do pay the Medicaid enhancement tax.) Their tax-exempt status gives non-profit hospitals a huge competitive advantage over for-profit medical centers such as the Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA), which would be the initial beneficiary of the proposed legislative changes.
The state's Certificate of Need law also gives existing hospitals a huge competitive advantage.
It requires that new medical facilities and expensive device purchases be preapproved by the state based upon “need.” This restricts competition because anyone trying to provide a new service must first prove to the state that the service is needed. Imagine if we treated, say, restaurants or snow plow contractors that way. Prices would be higher, choices limited. You might have only one Italian, one Mexican and one Greek restaurant in your area because the others wouldn't be “needed.”
By statute, the Medicaid enhancement tax applies to all hospitals, and CTCA refers to its own facilities as hospitals, so it is hard to see why it should avoid that tax. It is also hard to see how Granite Staters would be harmed by having another option for treating cancer. To even the playing field, the solution would seem to be relaxing the Certificate of Need laws rather than expanding them.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- What rising tide? Kuster vs. Kennedy - 17
- On Obamacare: Shaheen doesn't get it - 43
- No news is bad news: Hassan goes to CDC school - 9
- No right to know: Our silent superintendent - 1
- Boutin for Senate: Constituent service for District 16 - 5
- Sanborn for Senate: The obvious choice in District 9 - 2
- Secret arrests: Names contradict ICE narrative - 4
- Little for Senate: A voice for the Upper Valley - 1
- Edwards for Senate: A driven leader for Dist. 4 - 0
READER COMMENTS: 1
- GT Advanced Technology attorney hoping for Apple agreement today to allow more openness in bankruptcy court - 0
- Nashua caretaker wants evidence suppressed in sexual assault case - 0
- Former coach from Nashua charged in sex assaults claims confession was involuntary - 0
- NH highways have potentialy deadly guardrail end pieces, transportation commissioner says - 0
- Neighbor won't be charged in shooting death of Rumney chiropractor - 10
- Staples says it is probing possible payment card data breach - 1
- Manchester police: Ga. man stole truck in Mass. to visit mom in NH - 0
- South African Olympian Pistorius sentenced to five years in girlfriend's murder - 0
- Expect the unexpected in NHIAA field hockey tourneys - 0
A series of sharp exchanges at 2nd CD debate
Murder-suicide ruled in Fremont deaths
Keene police working to identify rioters, notify other colleges of students' participation
Locked in a dead heat, Shaheen, Brown spar