All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 3 views left. | Register | Sign In

Bananas vs. candy: Choices in Manchester

Manchester health officials hope to improve the eating habits of city residents by getting local shop owners to stock more fruits and vegetables. Good luck with that.

We don't mean to be cynical. There is nothing wrong with encouraging people to eat better food. This particular program sounds just fine. The privately funded effort involves having city health experts work with the owners of convenience stores and other small markets to have healthier foods stocked and prominently displayed. The idea is that residents, particularly children, will buy bananas or apples if they are placed as prominently as candy bars and soda are.

That's a much better approach than the one taken in Los Angeles, where fast food restaurants were banned from certain parts of the city on the theory that low-income people were simply too weak-willed to resist the temptation. But will children really skip the Skittles for pears? Count us skeptical.

It is true, as the city maintains, that in-store presentation makes a difference. Is it enough of a difference to make a significant impact on people's eating habits? Probably not. The effort is commendable, and it will be nice to see fruits in stores that don't stock them now. But don't expect this to make Manchester kids a lot healthier. It's not as though fruits and veggies are unavailable to center city residents now. If parents are not teaching good eating habits at home, kids won't make the right choices when they go to the market, no matter how many bananas are put on the counter.


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail

It's Trump for GOP, Sanders for Dems

Billionaire businessman Donald Trump won New Hampshire's Republican presidential nominating contest on Tuesday, solidifying his front-runner status...

Reader Poll

Sorry, no question available

More Editorials

Money for nothing: What's Bernie's problem again?

   6   Editorials PUBLISHED - 4:19 pm 2/08  

Clinton does Wall Street's bidding

   3   Editorials PUBLISHED - 4:28 pm 2/08  

Freshmen Follies: Senators bucking for promotion

   5   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:31 pm 2/07  

Under the weather: A little snow shuts down Trump

   8   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:31 pm 2/07  

Joe McQuaid: Christie is the real deal

   21   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:18 pm 2/06  

NH's Right Stuff: Alan Shepard's can-do attitude

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 6:11 pm 2/06  

Leftward ho! Clinton goes full progressive

   2   Editorials PUBLISHED - 6:11 pm 2/06  

Cruz's 'dirty trick': Giving Ben Carson a push

   10   Editorials PUBLISHED - 6:11 pm 2/06  

NH Angle - Editorials