Home » Opinion » Editorials
Fitness for what? Community college questions
Some further physical improvements to the Manchester Community College may be justified. The former vocational-technical college on Front Street has had substantial work done in recent years, including a new, technically-advanced main building. More work may be justified.
What is not fathomable, however, is a plan reported last week to include a student “fitness center'' as part of a new $6 million, 28,000-square-foot addition.
The community college system was originally chartered to be what was known in the day as a “trade'' college. It has served its purpose well, turning out builders, electricians, mechanics, HVAC experts and health workers.
It has been a sensible, affordable alternative to four-year colleges and universities. It has allowed a lot of adults to balance jobs while paying on a course-by-course basis.
But in recent years, even as American politicians speak of reviving American manufacturing, the former “voc-tech'' mission has been changed. It seems torn between offering a primarily technical menu of courses and becoming a glorified junior college, funneling students to or perhaps competing with UNH, Keene, Plymouth and a score of private schools.
Which brings us back to the “fitness center'' that was part of the plan unveiled to the Manchester Planning Board last week.
One of the reasons that the cost of four-year schools is going through the roof, we are told, is because of the “need'' those schools have to compete with their rivals to lure students. Students no longer want just bed, books and board. They want comfy amenities and the latest in fitness equipment.
Perhaps the relative affordability of the state's two-year “trade'' schools has been kept that way in part because they have not been competing with private or public universities with such amenities.
The Legislature ought to be asking the new community college leadership just what it thinks it is doing here. Private colleges, and even private-sector fitness centers, ought to be asking the same thing.
READER COMMENTS: 4
- Disengaged: Obama's lousy excuse - 14
- Underestimating NH: Gun control picks two wrong targets - 30
- Roaming jihadis: A terrorist visits Manchester - 4
- Athletes and PE: Give them credit for sports - 7
- The EPA's friend: It has a loyal ally in Shea-Porter - 16
- Leading vs. following: Ayotte, Shaheen and the polls - 24
- The cupcake police: Stop! In the name of lard! - 15
- Page One Editorial: Obama is right - 27
- Taxed tips: Another NH revenue grab - 9
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Wanted fugitive arrested by U.S. Marshals in Manchester - 0
- Gregg named CEO of Wall Street lobbying group - 0
- Portsmouth woman faces up to life in prison in fatal overdose - 0
- Mass. sex offender indicted for sex assault on child at Plaistow Walmart - 0
- Home care worker indicted for kidnapping, sexual assault of male client - 0
- Police say house guest helped himself to credit card - 0
- Police say women were smoking crack with 2-year-old in car - 0
- Tools, copper piping stolen from construction trailers in Manchester - 0
- Firefighters say casino revenue needed for 'public safety' - 8
Town may have to fix grave error
UNH hires firm to redesign one of its logos
Disengaged: Obama's lousy excuse
Chechen decries Boston attack