Home » Opinion » Editorials
Joseph W. McQuaid -- On gay marriage: Let the people vote
The bad news on the New Hampshire marriage issue? The hypocrisy on both sides remains breathtaking. The good news? There is a ray of hope that the people of New Hampshire may actually get to settle this important debate.
Some favoring “same-sex marriage'' insist that a Republican-led Legislature was elected in 2010 to concentrate on the economy, not on social issues. Yet it was a Democratic-led Legislature that campaigned on everything but gay marriage two years earlier and then spent considerable time pushing it through to be signed by a governor who had said he opposed it.
Some gay-marriage foes say the voters returned Republicans to a big majority as a direct response to that big social change. That may be so, but we don't recall many legislators campaigning on it.
Now those who got what they wanted say “game over.'' Any review of the issue is “turning back the clock'' and taking away “rights.'' Some gay-marriage proponents call anyone against them bigots; while some opponents smear the other side as emissaries of Satan.
Gay-marriage proponents cite a couple of polls as proof positive that the people of New Hampshire are on their side. Yet when Rep. David Bates last week suggested a November ballot question on the subject, the gay marriage crowd was adamantly against the idea. One spokesman called such a vote, “the world's most expensive public opinion survey, expecting the taxpayers to foot the bill.''
That is first-rate spin, but hardly factual.
The fact is a non-binding question on the November ballot would cost nothing and would be an excellent opportunity for everyone to weigh in on this divisive topic. (It is not something that should be done for run-of-the-mill issues.) But we can see why it is feared. In EVERY state where the voters have been allowed a say, they have voted overwhelmingly that traditional marriage between a man and a woman is, always has been, and should continue to be protected and treated as the unique and important societal institution that it is.
Rather than let a lameduck governor veto a gay-marriage repeal, we suggest that Rep. Bates withdraw that part of his bill and instead put forth the November ballot question by itself. Let the people decide and let the next legislature, and new governor, follow their will.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Comedian Joan Rivers dead at age 81 says daughter - 0
- U.S. says Islamic State video of journalist's killing is authentic - 0
- No paper on Monday; check UnionLeader.com for updated, breaking news - 0
- Concord attorney Leahy dies - 0
- Robin Williams’ ashes are scattered in San Francisco Bay - 0
- Syracuse, Iowa crowned top party schools - 0
- Parking fines cause disputes, raise revenues - 1
- Jon Cavaiani dies at 70; desperate stand in '71 led to Medal of Honor - 0
- Meriam Ibrahim, family welcomed as long journey ends in Manchester - 2
READER COMMENTS: 0
- UNH Notebook: Ground game is Stony Brook's rock - 0
- The debut of the 'The $30,000 Nutt' - 0
- How stable is this telephone pole? - 0
- Drew Cline: Two weeks before the election, no one is talking about guns - 1
- Fixing Obamacare: Shaheen offers no way out - 2
- Debate rule No. 1: Don't crash - 0
- Obamacare takes center stage at 1st Congressional debate - 2
- NHIAA Field Hockey Roundup: Londonderry edges Central - 0
- NHIAA Roundup: Brummett spurs Derryfield - 0
Keene riots a focus of gubernatorial debate
Fall hikers throughout NH put on notice
NH's back-road rest areas fading away
Fixing Obamacare: Shaheen offers no way out
Blackwater verdict stuns NH dad
Making it up: Shameless state Senate attacks