All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In

City school spending: Where cuts can be found

Can Manchester's school budget be trimmed without harming the quality of public education in the city? Yes, and Mayor Ted Gatsas has identified where.

Manchester has a pretty lean school budget overall. The city spends far less per-pupil ($9,826) than the state average ($12,775) and less than surrounding districts do. Bedford spends $11,229 per pupil, Goffstown $10,592 and Hooksett $10,871. But the money Manchester does spend goes overwhelmingly into teacher pay and benefits.

The average teacher salary in Manchester is $57,349. The average is $51,698 in Goffstown, $51,135 in Hooksett and a lowly $49,171 in Bedford. The state average is $53,702. Manchester pays its teachers $3,647 more than the state average and a whopping $8,178 more than Bedford does. And that does not include benefits, which are extremely generous in Manchester.

The city manages to pay its teachers that well even though only 44 percent of Manchester teachers have a master's degree. The state average is 54 percent. In Bedford, it's 60 percent.

According to the official school budget, in fiscal year 2012, 75 percent of Manchester's school budget goes to salaries and benefits. In Bedford, the figure is 70 percent.

Mayor Gatsas says the city can stay within its spending cap without massive teacher layoffs as long as the unions make concessions on compensation. He is absolutely correct.

Teacher compensation in Manchester has risen beyond the city's ability to pay. It has to be contained. The bad way to do that is to undertake massive layoffs. The responsible way is to negotiate compensation adjustments with the unions. Elected officials are willing to make a deal that will save jobs and meet the voter-mandated spending cap. Are the unions equally willing?


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail

More Editorials

Who would trust Hillary? Jeanne Shaheen would

   28   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:33 pm 9/03  

Caesar in chief: Lindsey Graham vs. James Madison

   5   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:33 pm 9/03  

Aldermen revolt: A tax cap in jeopardy

   38   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:35 pm 9/02  

Welfare king: This one is elected

   4   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:35 pm 9/02  

Clinton's emails: Putting herself above her country

   36   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:20 pm 9/01  

Gum control: What principals get to decide

   10   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:18 pm 9/01  

Ballot access games: Keeping Libertarians at bay

   11   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:08 pm 8/31  

Confirmed by science: Kids reject Obamalunch

   27   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:08 pm 8/31  

E-ZPass 10 years on: A definite success

   3   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:10 pm 8/30  

NH Angle - Editorials