Home » Opinion » Editorials
May 14. 2012 7:24PM
Salinger’s bill: It goes way too far
A well-intentioned bill written to protect the estate of the late author J.D. Salinger would wind up silencing journalists, artists and even average citizens if the Senate version is replaced by one offered by the House Commerce and Consumer Affairs Committee.
Senate Bill 175 was written at the request of Salinger’s surviving family after the famous author died in 2010. It would codify any Granite Stater’s “right to publicity” by prohibiting “the commercial use of his or her identity” for 70 years after death without the prior, written permission of the individual who died or his or her family or legal heirs.
Such protections have some obvious appeal. But here is the catch. The Senate recognized that there should be exceptions for journalism, art, commentary, documentary works and other forms of reporting and expression. The House Commerce and Consumer Affairs Committee removed all of the Senate’s exemptions, leaving only a short phrase, “subject to limitations imposed by the New Hampshire constitution and the United States Constitution.”
What, exactly, does that mean? It means the bill would create a thriving business for lawyers. If a deceased person’s “identity” — a word the bill does not define — is used in a way that could be called commercial, lawyers could threaten to sue to stop it. It would chill or end perfectly legal and legitimate activities that do not exploit anyone, as the exception is far too vague.
For instance, a sports memorabilia show could not feature in an advertisement any baseball card that shows a deceased player from New Hampshire. (Would the sale of that baseball card even be legal?) Could a newspaper reprint commemorative editions, as they would be filled with the identities of deceased Granite Staters? Could antique dealers sell photographs of dead Granite Staters? Probably not. The bill even could be held to prohibit the sale of any painting or other work of art depicting a deceased Granite Stater.
The House committee amendment strips important protections for expressive work that must be reinstated.
Senate Bill 175 was written at the request of Salinger’s surviving family after the famous author died in 2010. It would codify any Granite Stater’s “right to publicity” by prohibiting “the commercial use of his or her identity” for 70 years after death without the prior, written permission of the individual who died or his or her family or legal heirs.
Such protections have some obvious appeal. But here is the catch. The Senate recognized that there should be exceptions for journalism, art, commentary, documentary works and other forms of reporting and expression. The House Commerce and Consumer Affairs Committee removed all of the Senate’s exemptions, leaving only a short phrase, “subject to limitations imposed by the New Hampshire constitution and the United States Constitution.”
What, exactly, does that mean? It means the bill would create a thriving business for lawyers. If a deceased person’s “identity” — a word the bill does not define — is used in a way that could be called commercial, lawyers could threaten to sue to stop it. It would chill or end perfectly legal and legitimate activities that do not exploit anyone, as the exception is far too vague.
For instance, a sports memorabilia show could not feature in an advertisement any baseball card that shows a deceased player from New Hampshire. (Would the sale of that baseball card even be legal?) Could a newspaper reprint commemorative editions, as they would be filled with the identities of deceased Granite Staters? Could antique dealers sell photographs of dead Granite Staters? Probably not. The bill even could be held to prohibit the sale of any painting or other work of art depicting a deceased Granite Stater.
The House committee amendment strips important protections for expressive work that must be reinstated.
- Northern Pass vs. the unregulated - 3
- Former PNE power customers promised payment - 1
- Legislation gives Northern Pass project a pass, foes insist - 11
- DOE hears from NH Sens. Shaheen, Ayotte on Northern Pass project - 4
- NH Chambers of Commerce opinions on Northern Pass split geographically - 0
- Northern Pass told in White Mountains: Get off our land - 34
- Wind farms inspire email blast to NH lawmakers - 7
- Natural gas supplier: We'll still take on PSNH - 7
- Manchester-based power supplier unplugged - 3
ExxonMobile lawyers swing hard at MTBE additive case
READER COMMENTS: 2- John Habib's City Sports: Tourney time nears for JVs, too - 0
- NHIAA Scoreboard, May 17, 2013 - 0
- NHIAA Roundup: Hanover's Cravero hurls another no-hitter - 0
- Lawyer says Northern Pass in 'a corner' - 0
- Fisher Cats score in 9th to win - 0
- Sox edge Twins in 10, 3-2 - 0
- Nashua man arrested on charges of sexually assaulting underage girl - 0
- Mass. men arrested on drugs, weapons charges - 0
- Memorial boys take city track meet for 10th straight year - 0
NHIAA Tennis: Bedford is championship-focused
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available



