Home » Opinion » Editorials
June 14. 2012 8:27PM
Genius school budget? Not even close
Said Manchester School Board member Kathy Staub after the aldermen passed Alderman Joyce Craig's budget, which gave an additional $2 million to city schools, “I was delighted that Joyce Craig found a way to get the school district what they asked for but lower everyone's taxes. She's a genius.”
Be thankful, parents, that neither Staub nor Craig teaches personal finance in the city school system.
Craig's “genius” was to spend one-time money, much of it available because of unanticipated budget savings, and give it to the school system to be spent on teachers. It was hardly an innovation. The city has repeatedly used one-time money to pay operating expenses.
In 2003, aldermen passed a budget that, like Craig's, came with a lower tax rate than the mayor's proposal, but only because it included $1.6 million in non-recurring funds, including $650,000 from land sales that were not identified — the aldermen simply assumed they could sell that much city property.
In 2007, aldermen passed a budget that delivered a bigger tax cut than the mayor had proposed, but they reached that number by draining $3.5 million from the city's $5.3 million economic development reserve fund and spending it on operating expenses.
For years, city school budgets have been inflated by one-time revenues, often from the school district's expendable trusts. Those special accounts were drained of millions of dollars to pay for operating expenses in 2009 and 2011. In 2010, federal stimulus money was used.
Earlier this year, a city teacher complained of the “crazy” way the city handles its school budget. Year after year teachers get pink slips in the spring and then have to wait until July to see if their positions are actually cut. Why does this happen? Because the aldermen and school board create budget holes by approving spending the city cannot afford. They issue pink slips just in case they cannot find enough money by the end of the year to cover all the spending they've approved. At the last minute, they fill some of the budget holes with whatever one-time money they can find, and they fire enough teachers to fill the rest. The whole process starts again the following year.
That's not genius. That's crazy. And aldermen just kept the process going for another year.
Be thankful, parents, that neither Staub nor Craig teaches personal finance in the city school system.
Craig's “genius” was to spend one-time money, much of it available because of unanticipated budget savings, and give it to the school system to be spent on teachers. It was hardly an innovation. The city has repeatedly used one-time money to pay operating expenses.
In 2003, aldermen passed a budget that, like Craig's, came with a lower tax rate than the mayor's proposal, but only because it included $1.6 million in non-recurring funds, including $650,000 from land sales that were not identified — the aldermen simply assumed they could sell that much city property.
In 2007, aldermen passed a budget that delivered a bigger tax cut than the mayor had proposed, but they reached that number by draining $3.5 million from the city's $5.3 million economic development reserve fund and spending it on operating expenses.
For years, city school budgets have been inflated by one-time revenues, often from the school district's expendable trusts. Those special accounts were drained of millions of dollars to pay for operating expenses in 2009 and 2011. In 2010, federal stimulus money was used.
Earlier this year, a city teacher complained of the “crazy” way the city handles its school budget. Year after year teachers get pink slips in the spring and then have to wait until July to see if their positions are actually cut. Why does this happen? Because the aldermen and school board create budget holes by approving spending the city cannot afford. They issue pink slips just in case they cannot find enough money by the end of the year to cover all the spending they've approved. At the last minute, they fill some of the budget holes with whatever one-time money they can find, and they fire enough teachers to fill the rest. The whole process starts again the following year.
That's not genius. That's crazy. And aldermen just kept the process going for another year.
- Learning the way of the gun in Wakefield - 2
- Peterborough's renovated Adams Pool to open in June - 0
- Supreme Court says Manchester man who lost towed car while hospitalized can sue - 4
- Powerball jackpot: Another chance at the (your) golden ticket - 1
- Endowment established for Milford support organization Bridges - 0
- Flags to fly at half-staff Wednesday and Friday - 0
- NH Lottery games debut Mother's Day - 0
- Marathon bomber's body entombed in undisclosed location - 1
- Powerball jackpot grows to $270 million for Saturday - 0
No more Winni whoppers: Fishing Derby winner will have to take lie detector test
READER COMMENTS: 11- Man shot to death on Manchester street late Saturday - 2
- UNH hires firm to redesign one of its logos - 10
- Disengaged: Obama's lousy excuse - 11
- Underestimating NH: Gun control picks two wrong targets - 18
- Roaming jihadis: A terrorist visits Manchester - 3
- Ted Siefer's City Hall: School board on the defensive over Cupcake-gate - 1
- Garry Rayno's State House Dome: All eyes on House as casino vote nears - 2
- 43 killers on lifetime parole - but where? - 3
- Official says NH abortion sites need state scrutiny - 13
NY man stable after destroying classic Porsche 911 in Route 16 wreck
READER COMMENTS: 1
Sorry, no question available



