Home » Opinion » Editorials
Opt out: Say no to Medicaid expansion
Now that it can do so without penalty thanks to Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act, New Hampshire should opt out of the act’s unnecessary and expensive Medicaid expansion. Unfortunately, the state will probably need a new governor to make that happen.
Obamacare achieved a good deal of its “universal” health insurance coverage not by making insurance more affordable or improving the system, but by making more people eligible for Medicaid. The law required states to offer Medicaid coverage to eligible households with incomes of up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level.
New Hampshire has long set Medicaid eligibility at 63 percent of the poverty level. The federal government is to pay 95 percent of the cost of those new enrollees — for now. But the changes also required states to more aggressively pursue people who were eligible under the old rules but had not signed up. The states would be responsible for 100 percent of the costs of those new enrollees. The changes were estimated to cost the state about $30 million a year.
New Hampshire simply cannot afford that. But Gov. John Lynch never raised a forceful public objection to the expansion. While other governors strongly opposed the Medicaid expansion, Lynch made a few meek statements of concern.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that the expansion was unconstitutional because the law did not simply adjust the Medicare law, but “transformed” the program. States now have the option of saying no to the new enrollment plan and keeping their existing Medicaid guidelines. New Hampshire cannot afford any expansion, so it needs to opt out. But can we count on Lynch to do that? Probably not.
That would leave this overdue and necessary act to the next governor.
Voters need to ask the candidates how they would handle that decision. Tens of millions of dollars — a year — hang in the balance.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Hassan’s falsehoods: Does she even care about the truth? - 18
- Tax credit math: Who owns your money? - 9
- Voter restrictions: Who will govern us? - 26
- School board papers: Beaudry gets left behind - 1
- Data overreach Are programs really justified? The weak case for PRISM. - 12
- A Medicaid reduction? That is not likely - 8
- Border security? Maybe, some day, perhaps. Or not - 35
- Priority profs: University system tops HHS - 5
- Recognizing father: Not PC, but still OK - 1
READER COMMENTS: 23
- Hellickson, Rays handcuff Red Sox - 0
- Celtics' Rivers, Ainge meet to clear air - 0
- Fisher Cats drop second straight - 0
- Troubles mount for Patriots' Hernandez - 0
- Central High student says he was knocked unconscious; police investigate racial motive - 0
- New Hampshire Religion News in Brief - 0
- Police investigate cause of injuries to Seabrook family - 0
- Queen City community to celebrate U.N. World Refugee Day today - 0
- Bethlehem Hebrew Congregation’s 93rd season has something for everyone - 0
Manipulating NH: Bloomberg and the terrorist
Celtics' Rivers, Ainge meet to clear air
Troubles mount for Patriots' Hernandez
Tax credit math: Who owns your money?
Drones and privacy: Debate just taking off