Home » Opinion » Editorials
NH property taxes: Not what some claim they are
New Hampshire’s Live Free or Die Alliance shined the spotlight this week on the bogeyman that is the state’s property tax rate. Good for the alliance.
The claim that we have the “highest” or “third highest” property taxes in the country is often thrown around, usually by those politicians pushing to saddle the state with a broadbased sales or income tax. These are also the people who claim that enactment of such a tax will “lower” those terrible property taxes.
Neither claim is true.
No argument here that our property taxes are high. But the local taxpayer has only himself to blame. Property taxes are enacted and spent locally, which is their “beauty.” We know our local elected officials and if we pay attention, we should elect only those who spend prudently. What is also true is that New Hampshire has one of the lowest overall tax burdens in the country.
But the “third-highest” property taxes in the nation is misleading in the extreme. As a 2008 Live Free or Die Alliance study showed, the claim is flawed. It is so in part because it counts all New Hampshire property taxes and lumps them all on the state’s per capita population. But the state has a huge number of second homes on which those taxes are paid and much of that second-home stock is owned by out-of-staters.
Not surprisingly, the property tax bogeyman was raised most recently by Democratic candidate for governor Jackie Cilley. Cilley won’t take the pledge to veto a state income tax to which she is “open.”
An outfit called “PolitiFact,” which is being promoted by left-leaning news media and which claims to “fact-check” politicians’ claims, rated candidate Cilley’s claim about our property taxes as “true” and “spot on.”
“PolitiFact” needs to turn its “truth meter” on itself.
- David Harsanyi: Get the IRS out of the speech business altogether - 9
- Another View -- Ryan Gallagher: The U.S. government spies on reporters all too frequently - 4
- John Stossel: Who has true grit anymore? - 0
- Another View: New Hampshire would take a risky bet on casinos - 6
- Ramesh Ponnuru: In flextime fight, liberals play to their stereotype - 0
- Jonah Goldberg: Benghazi's smoking guns - 1
- Another View: Nashua does need to conduct its own review of commuter rail - 1
- George Will: Forgetting the lessons of Watergate - 0
- Charles Arlinghaus: Screeching lies does not count as debate - 2
Charles Krauthammer: Redacted truth, subjunctive outrage
READER COMMENTS: 0- Disengaged: Obama's lousy excuse - 0
- Underestimating NH: Gun control picks two wrong targets - 0
- Roaming jihadis: A terrorist visits Manchester - 0
- Ted Siefer's City Hall: School board on the defensive over Cupcake-gate - 0
- Garry Rayno's State House Dome: All eyes on House as casino vote nears - 0
- 43 killers on lifetime parole - but where? - 0
- Official says NH abortion sites need state scrutiny - 0
- Chechen decries Boston attack - 0
- Heroin use, deaths spike in New Hampshire - 0



