Home » Opinion » Editorials
August 23. 2012 12:38AM
Unaccountable: Obama and the middle class
When President Obama campaigned in Windham last week, he told the assembled crowd that he is running to restore the middle class, and that he is the only one who can do it. Granite Staters have good reason not to believe that.
The President said it was important for voters to choose him so he can continue his policies to make the middle class stronger. Six days later, the Pew Research Center released a study on the middle class. It found that middle-class incomes grew slowly from 2000 until the 2007 recession and 2008 financial crisis, USA Today reported. Middle-class incomes and wealth have declined since 2007.
President Obama pins 100 percent of the blame for middle-class struggles on President Bush and other Republicans. In Windham, he said he has always maintained that restoring the economy would take more than one term, even more than one President. That is not so. Speaking of the economy, he told ABC News just after he was inaugurated in 2009:
“One nice thing about the situation I find myself in is that I will be held accountable. You know, I’ve got four years. And, you know, a year from now I think people are going to see that we’re starting to make some progress. But there’s still going to be some pain out there. If I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition.”
Now he is asking Granite Staters not to hold him accountable, but to blame the President he replaced nearly four years ago. He is asking us to believe that his policies have nothing whatsoever to do with the decline in middle-class income and wealth over the last five years. He is asking us to believe that the policies that have driven the nation $5 trillion further into debt while keeping the unemployment rate above 8 percent for the entire duration of his presidency will somehow start to work as soon as we give him a second term.
Obama surrogate Madeleine Albright said last week that Democrats would continue blaming Bush for the economy “forever.” So at the end of Obama’s second term, when the economy continues to sputter, it will still be Bush’s fault.
Whomever you blame for the events of 2007 and 2008, the idea that we can revive the middle class by continuing the redistributionist policies that have hurt it so badly for the last 42 months is a fantasy.
The President said it was important for voters to choose him so he can continue his policies to make the middle class stronger. Six days later, the Pew Research Center released a study on the middle class. It found that middle-class incomes grew slowly from 2000 until the 2007 recession and 2008 financial crisis, USA Today reported. Middle-class incomes and wealth have declined since 2007.
President Obama pins 100 percent of the blame for middle-class struggles on President Bush and other Republicans. In Windham, he said he has always maintained that restoring the economy would take more than one term, even more than one President. That is not so. Speaking of the economy, he told ABC News just after he was inaugurated in 2009:
“One nice thing about the situation I find myself in is that I will be held accountable. You know, I’ve got four years. And, you know, a year from now I think people are going to see that we’re starting to make some progress. But there’s still going to be some pain out there. If I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition.”
Now he is asking Granite Staters not to hold him accountable, but to blame the President he replaced nearly four years ago. He is asking us to believe that his policies have nothing whatsoever to do with the decline in middle-class income and wealth over the last five years. He is asking us to believe that the policies that have driven the nation $5 trillion further into debt while keeping the unemployment rate above 8 percent for the entire duration of his presidency will somehow start to work as soon as we give him a second term.
Obama surrogate Madeleine Albright said last week that Democrats would continue blaming Bush for the economy “forever.” So at the end of Obama’s second term, when the economy continues to sputter, it will still be Bush’s fault.
Whomever you blame for the events of 2007 and 2008, the idea that we can revive the middle class by continuing the redistributionist policies that have hurt it so badly for the last 42 months is a fantasy.
- Pat Buchanan: For what should Americans die? - 0
- Your Turn, NH: Common Core will be a costly burden for students, taxpayers - 10
- Jonah Goldberg: The IRS was only following Obama's lead - 15
- Another View -- Glenn Normandeau: Protecting endangered non-game species a NH success story - 1
- Charles Krauthammer: Redacted truth, subjunctive outrage - 0
- David Harsanyi: Get the IRS out of the speech business altogether - 10
- Another View -- Ryan Gallagher: The U.S. government spies on reporters all too frequently - 4
- John Stossel: Who has true grit anymore? - 0
- Another View: New Hampshire would take a risky bet on casinos - 7
Kathy Sullivan: The IRS scandal exposes flaw behind tax-exempt politicking
READER COMMENTS: 0- NHIAA boxscores, summaries for May 20, 2013 - 0
- Police say man held girlfriend in car, arrest him - 0
- Overtime puts stress on Nashua police budget - 0
- Manchester, church group seek accord on breakfast for homeless - 1
- Ky. Sen. Rand Paul to NH GOP: Let's look like America - 2
- Man gunned down on Manchester street was talented graffiti artist - 0
- Experts weigh in on UNH logo designs - 0
- Two had a NH history before brutal Bedford attack - 0
- Derry marks a soldier's death - 0
Bedford's Shapiro hits lacrosse milestone
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available



