Home » Opinion » Editorials
'A terrorist attack': Now they tell us
On Thursday, White House spokesman Jay Carney finally uttered the word the White House had been careful to avoid when mentioning the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, including the ambassador. The word was “terrorist.”
“It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack,” he said. So why did he insist for more than a week that the uprisings against U.S. properties and personnel were merely the conduct of “extremists” protesting a bad movie? As The Washington Examiner pointed out, both Carney and President Obama referred to the Benghazi attackers as simply “extremists” before Thursday. Why Thursday?
On Wednesday Matthew Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, testified before Congress that the U.S. ambassador to Libya was killed “in the course of a terrorist attack.” After that, the White House acknowledged the truth, as though no one had ever suggested otherwise.
So now it is official: The United States has sustained a terrorist attack on American soil on Obama’s watch. That raises two “self-evident” questions.
1. Was the administration adequately protecting U.S. personnel on the anniversary of 9/11? The answer is a definite “no.” As a Wall Street Journal story detailing numerous security lapses in Benghazi and across the Middle East put it last week: “The State Department chose to maintain only limited security in Benghazi, Libya, despite months of sporadic attacks there on U.S. and other Western missions.”
2. How is Obama’s strategy of engagement with the Muslim world working out? Recall that Obama during his campaign for President said he would change the way Muslims perceived the United States by making sure they knew he was listening to them and understood them.
Our naive President really understands little about the people whose desire to kill Americans cannot be assuaged by pretty speeches.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Charles Arlinghaus: Don't believe hype on Medicaid expansion - 0
- Thomas Sowell: Common sense vs. the military's pursuit of political correctness - 0
- Diana Lacey: $50 million in personnel cuts would hurt NH - 26
- Jonah Goldberg: Freedom: the unfolding revolution - 3
- Deroy Murdock: Corruption aside, the IRS has too much Obamacare authority - 8
- Thomas Sowell: There's lots of bad economic thinking in the immigration debate - 0
- Roger Simon: The slacker who came in from the cold - 3
- Charles Krauthammer: Pushing the envelope, NSA-style - 4
- George Will: Slipping the Constitution's leash - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Santos drives in three as Curve beat Fisher Cats in 10 - 0
- Large billboards grabbing attention on Route 101 in Epping - 1
- Pearl Street lot proposal involves student housing in Manchester - 0
- Manchester VFW posts fights to survive without poker cash - 0
- Surveillance led NSA to 50 terror 'events' - 0
- One arrested as Concord gun-control rally gets rowdy - 13
- Celtics, Clippers call off Doc deal - 0
- High school football is in the air as CHad practice opens - 0
- Agencies to offer summer food service to Derry children in need - 0
Voter restrictions: Who will govern us?
Nashua couple's deaths called suspicious
Mother of drowned baby gets prison time