Home » Opinion » Editorials
No income tax: 'Yes' on Question 1
New Hampshire voters will be asked next Tuesday whether they want to permanently ban a state income tax. They should vote "yes."
The first constitutional amendment on next week's ballot will be phrased as follows: "Notwithstanding any general or special provision of this constitution, the general court shall not have the power or authority to impose and levy any assessment, rate or tax upon income earned by any natural person; however, nothing in this article shall be construed to prohibit any tax in effect on January 1, 2012, or adjustment to the rate of such a tax."
Here is what that means: All existing taxes, including those on interest and dividends (which are income taxes) will remain in effect, but the Legislature may not create any new personal income tax. The phrase "natural person" restricts the ban to actual human beings. That leaves the state free to continue taxing businesses.
Opponents claim that this ban would write tax policy into the constitution. But tax policy is - and always has been - a part of both the United States and New Hampshire Constitutions. Their argument is bogus, and they know it.
This amendment simply would make a new income tax unconstitutional. Passing it would make it harder for future politicians to destroy the New Hampshire Advantage because they were too cowardly to budget responsibly. All of us should support that.
- Dave D'Onofrio's Sox Beat: Alfredo Aceves an ace in the hole - 0
- Red Sox win rain-delayed twinbill opener - 0
- House, Senate at standoff over vaccines, voter registration bill - 0
- UPDATED: House proposes 3-year Medicaid expansion plan - 1
- UPDATE: Elderly man burned in North Hampton camper fire has died - 3
- Windham to reconsider dodgeball ban - 0
- Hooksett students taken to nearby school after gas leak - 0
- Londonderry students who haven't had whooping cough vaccine asked to stay home - 0
- UPDATED: House, Senate agree on capital budget, including new $38 million women's prison - 0



