Aug 21, 2014
Aug 14, 2014
Jul 24, 2014
Jul 16, 2014
Embattled financial adviser fights lien
The home of Frederick McMenimen in Exeter is among the assets being debated in his Chapter 7 claim in U.S. Bankruptcy Court. (JAMES A. KIMBLE/FILE)
BRENTWOOD - An Exeter financial adviser charged with stealing $1 million from two former clients is moving forward with efforts to upend an alleged victim's lien on his 3,700-square-foot home.
Frederick McMenimen wants a bankruptcy judge to nullify a $900,000 lien filed against him in superior court by one of his alleged victims, Victoria Wagstaff of North Hampton.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge J. Michael Deasy has given McMenimen until Friday to submit whatever evidence he has to support his argument. Wagstaff will be able to submit evidence to rebut McMenimen's request on the same day, according to the judge's order. The matter will be taken up at a hearing in December. The hearing is among a number of court battles that began just before McMenimen's indictment by a federal grand jury in October. He faces a 31-count indictment charging him with money laundering, mail fraud and tax evasion.
McMenimen heads to trial in U.S. District Court the week of March 8.
Federal prosecutors said the two victims were financially unsophisticated and longtime family friends. The women believed they were entrusting their life savings to McMenimen for high-return investments, according to prosecutors.
At the time, McMenimen was a registered representative of Prudential. Prosecutors say Prudential has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
McMenimen allegedly used stolen funds to pay $140,000 on his home mortgage, $350,000 in personal credit card debt and $120,000 in tuition for private colleges and schools for his three children.
Wagstaff had filed a civil lawsuit against McMenimen in Rockingham County Superior Court in January, seeking to recoup her money. A judge approved a $900,000 lien on McMenimen's Exeter home, but the lawsuit was essentially brought to a halt two months later as a result of McMenimen filing for personal bankruptcy.
McMenimen is also trying to dodge another $1.4 million civil judgment awarded by a Massachusetts jury. In that case, a jury found that McMenimen defrauded his late uncle while selling him a life insurance policy. Defense lawyer Michael Feinman said in court papers that McMenimen is entitled to avoid the lien under state law. Feinman argued that a federal tax lien of $341,000, and two home mortgages already outweighs the fair market value of McMenimen's home. Feinman said the home - which is currently up for sale - is valued at $455,000.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Fugitive in Manchester shooting, stabbing cases caught by Marshals, police - 0
- Hampton Falls standoff suspect linked to burglaries, fake-cop ploy - 0
- Woman charged in fatal Hampton crash wants blood-test thrown out of court - 0
- Home confinement rejected for ex-Derry town employee - 0
- Manchester man arrested for aggravated drunk driving - 0
- Manchester Crime Watch: Fugitive in shooting, stabbing cases brought to court - 0
- Homeless man faces DWI charges in Dover - 0
- Amherst couple charged in sale of lost wedding ring - 0
- Donation jar thief said to be Bay State man - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- NH Motor Speedway to again host two Sprint Cup Series weekends in 2015 - 0
- St. Anselm football players practice ini August heat - 0
- White, Glenn lift Fisher Cats over Harrisburg, 6-4 - 0
- KSC field hockey first in coaches poll - 0
- New England Patriots guard Mankins traded to Tampa for TE Wright - 0
- NH Fisher Cat Lee still striving for making it to the major leagues - 0
- Former city restaurateur gets jail sentence for sex assault - 0
- New Manchester school district standards to give teachers more leeway - 0
- Conway adult tests positive for EEE - 0
Backyard boulder kills Raymond homeowner
Market Basket: 'So close, yet so far'
KSC field hockey first in coaches poll
GOP for legal pot? Hemignway's high help
Ohio's Rob Portman: GOP can win back Senate
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917