Aug 28, 2014
Aug 21, 2014
Aug 14, 2014
Jul 24, 2014
Embattled financial adviser fights lien
The home of Frederick McMenimen in Exeter is among the assets being debated in his Chapter 7 claim in U.S. Bankruptcy Court. (JAMES A. KIMBLE/FILE)
BRENTWOOD - An Exeter financial adviser charged with stealing $1 million from two former clients is moving forward with efforts to upend an alleged victim's lien on his 3,700-square-foot home.
Frederick McMenimen wants a bankruptcy judge to nullify a $900,000 lien filed against him in superior court by one of his alleged victims, Victoria Wagstaff of North Hampton.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge J. Michael Deasy has given McMenimen until Friday to submit whatever evidence he has to support his argument. Wagstaff will be able to submit evidence to rebut McMenimen's request on the same day, according to the judge's order. The matter will be taken up at a hearing in December. The hearing is among a number of court battles that began just before McMenimen's indictment by a federal grand jury in October. He faces a 31-count indictment charging him with money laundering, mail fraud and tax evasion.
McMenimen heads to trial in U.S. District Court the week of March 8.
Federal prosecutors said the two victims were financially unsophisticated and longtime family friends. The women believed they were entrusting their life savings to McMenimen for high-return investments, according to prosecutors.
At the time, McMenimen was a registered representative of Prudential. Prosecutors say Prudential has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
McMenimen allegedly used stolen funds to pay $140,000 on his home mortgage, $350,000 in personal credit card debt and $120,000 in tuition for private colleges and schools for his three children.
Wagstaff had filed a civil lawsuit against McMenimen in Rockingham County Superior Court in January, seeking to recoup her money. A judge approved a $900,000 lien on McMenimen's Exeter home, but the lawsuit was essentially brought to a halt two months later as a result of McMenimen filing for personal bankruptcy.
McMenimen is also trying to dodge another $1.4 million civil judgment awarded by a Massachusetts jury. In that case, a jury found that McMenimen defrauded his late uncle while selling him a life insurance policy. Defense lawyer Michael Feinman said in court papers that McMenimen is entitled to avoid the lien under state law. Feinman argued that a federal tax lien of $341,000, and two home mortgages already outweighs the fair market value of McMenimen's home. Feinman said the home - which is currently up for sale - is valued at $455,000.
READER COMMENTS: 2
- NH killer in 1991 Smart trial seeks time with wife - 3
- Newport shooting victim in stable but critical condition - 0
- Nashua arrests 9 on drug warrants - 0
- Police: Nashua man in car targeted by gunfire was felon with gun - 1
- Man shot at in Nashua drive-by charged with unrelated possession of stolen gun - 0
- NH Supreme Court rules 4 teen killers entitled to sentencing hearings - 6
- Hampton woman who fatally struck pedestrian wants blood test thrown out of court - 1
- Man seeks to upend conviction in Deerfield home invasion case - 0
- Police say North Hampton man distributed child sex abuse images - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Goffstown's Bourque impresses; Memorial, Bishop Guertin, Pinkerton win in Queen City Jamboree - 0
- Hanover boys soccer edges defense-minded BG - 0
- NH Fisher Cats, Pierre stun Rock Cats in 4-3 win - 0
- Helping hands for new St. Anselm students in Manchester on move in day - 0
- To market, to market: Market Basket shoppers flock on in - 4
- Nashua Market Basket employee: 'Worth every day of work lost' - 4
- NH teen killers to get sentence reviews after state Supreme Court decision - 1
- Lakes Region Casino for sale last two months; asking price $3.5 million, manager says - 1
- Hudson police warn of cars being broken into - 0
Where is Shaheen? Hiding from you
Enter to win tickets to see Paula Poundstone
Win tickets to see Steven Wright
Hooksett highs: A good multiple choice test
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917