Home » Opinion » Editorials
Senate exercised due diligence upon checking into Susan Rice
Speaking bluntly to the controversial woman being considered for U.S. secretary of state, one senator accused her of being misleading, saying: "Instead of seizing the opportunity, it seems to me, Dr. Rice, you have danced around it and, sort of, stuck to the party line...."
Those sexist Republicans and their trumped up opposition to minority women! Except, that senator was Joe Biden. The woman was Condoleezza Rice, George W. Bush's nominee for secretary of state.
The Obama administration is hinting that the President's choice to succeed Hillary Clinton as secretary of state will be current U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice. For expressing skepticism that Rice is the best choice for this important position (held by Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Daniel Webster among many others), some Republicans have been accused of being sexist or racist or both. Who could possibly vote against a minorty woman nominated for secretary of state?
John Kerry, for one. He and a dozen other liberals voted against Condoleezza Rice, the largest vote against a secretary of state nominee since Henry Clay's nomination in 1825. Only Democrats are allowed to vote against minorities and women on principle, obviously.
Susan Rice went on national television and told the American people that the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans was a protest against an Internet movie trailer. That was not true. She blames our intelligence agencies. But the CIA says there was no evidence of a protest. How Rice wound up misleading the American voters just before an election is a question that needs to be answered before she can be considered for this job. Her temperament also is a legitimate issue. Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank has called her "extremely abrasive" and "not necessarily diplomatic." Even liberal Maine Republican Susan Collins questions Rice's fitness for the job. Sexism? No, due diligence, which is what the Senate is supposed to do.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Data overreach Are programs really justified? The weak case for PRISM. - 11
- A Medicaid reduction? That is not likely - 8
- Border security? Maybe, some day, perhaps. Or not - 34
- Priority profs: University system tops HHS - 5
- Recognizing father: Not PC, but still OK - 1
- Closing Hanover St.: Not a 'free market' move - 6
- Step into the past: Discover old NH this weekend - 0
- Racial harmony: On preferences, it exists - 8
- School accountability: It is up to the parents - 12
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Driver rescued after Franklin crash, 50-foot plunge - 0
- Storms knock out power to about 3,600 PSNH customers - 0
- Nashua couple's deaths called suspicious - 0
- American Medical Response back in good graces of key Manchester officials - 0
- Lebanon’s Colette Schmidt captures N.E. girls’ golf tourney crown - 0
- Sixteen make cut at State Am qualifying - 0
- Granite Stater Matt Bonner in position for another NBA title - 0
- Clippers, Celtics resume talks on Doc, Garnett deal - 0
- Hampton man indicted for distributing child porn - 0
Epping man’s hope for working van realized
Mother of drowned baby gets prison time
Salem seniors make a mind-body connection
Traffic stops in spotlight
One era ends, another begins at Union Leader
A Medicaid reduction? That is not likely
Study recommends Millyard parking garage