All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In


Business on tap: A deregulation success story

Nanobreweries - tiny breweries that produce fewer than 2,000 barrels of beer a year - are expanding in New Hampshire thanks to a 2011 state law that relaxed regulations on them. Will legislators close these small businesses next year by returning to the old, more burdensome regulations?

New Hampshire is home to some well-known microbreweries such as Smuttynose Brewing Co. in Portsmouth. These brewers have to pay a $1,200 annual fee to the state and abide by strict regulations on serving beer (along with food, for example). Microbreweries stimulated demand for craft beers, but paying a $1,200 fee and having to be regulated like a restaurant was a big burden for would-be startups. So last year legislators relaxed the rules to give beer afficionados the opportunity to create start-ups in their garages or basements the way tech entrepreneurs famously have done.

It has worked. Nanobreweries like Earth Eagle Brewings in Portsmouth, Blue Lobster in Hampton and Throwback Brewery in North Hampton are popping up and adding to the local economy. These small businesses would be crushed if the state undid this law. Democrats, who now control the state House of Representatives and the corner office, said Republicans went too far in rolling back regulations. This is one rollback that everyone should agree was a good move.


Comments


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment


You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.



More Editorials

The future of dams: A study will be good to watch

   11   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:57 pm 8/17  

What is in a name? Democrats dumping Jefferson

   13   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:57 pm 8/17  

Under the boardwalk: A coverup we'd like to keep

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:24 pm 8/16  

The two-party two-step: Laurel and Hardy writ large

   14   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:28 pm 8/15  

Trumping the Bern: Is the establishment listening?

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:28 pm 8/15  

Seized server: Clinton’s in a fine mess

   54   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:50 pm 8/13  

To the Macks: A Londonderry institution lives

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:50 pm 8/13  

‘Disturbing’ videos? A talking point forgotten

   32   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:20 pm 8/12  

Ballot selfies: Bye-bye speech ban

   1   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:20 pm 8/12  


NH Angle - Editorials