Home » Opinion » Editorials
Holding steady: Gun rights after Newtown
In a development that should surprise no one, the American people in the weeks immediately following the unspeakable tragedy in Newtown, Conn., have responded in a more measured fashion than their politicians have. Polls are showing a level-headedness among the populace that has not been apparent inside the beltway.
On Thursday, Gallup released a poll showing that 58 percent of Americans said "the laws governing the sale of firearms" should be "made more strict." That is up from 43 percent just last year, but it remains 20 points below the high of 78 percent in 1990.
And for the first time this century, more Americans (47 percent) told Gallup that they preferred to see new gun laws as well as existing laws made tougher than said they preferred strengthening existing laws without passing new ones (46 percent).
What kinds of tougher gun laws do Americans support? The poll found that 62 percent supported outlawing ammunition clips that hold more than 10 bullets, and 92 percent supported performing background checks on all buyers at gun shows.
Given all the talk of gun bans and even confiscation, those are modest changes. There has been no shift in public opinion away from the idea that Americans should continue to be free to keep and bear arms.
But there has been a post-Newtown backlash. It has come not against the National Rifle Association or gun rights, but against those who have advocated taking away Americans' firearms. Asked if they would be for a ban on "assault rifles," 51 percent of Americans said no, only 44 percent said yes. Asked if they supported a ban on civilian ownership of handguns, a stunning 78 percent said no. That is the highest level of opposition to a handgun ban since Gallup began asking the question in 1959.
Gallup also found that 54 percent of Americans have a favorable opinion of the National Rifle Association. That is 36 points higher than Congress' approval rating as measured by another Gallup poll earlier this month. Any politician considering using Newtown to justify a massive gun grab should pause to consider why those numbers are not reversed.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Another View - Charles Lane: Obama's wedge issue is the seductive lure of golf - 0
- Jonah Goldberg: If the Islamic State is not evil, then what is? - 2
- George Will: Will we build the Navy we need? - 1
- Betsy McCaughey: Congress should take the lead on Iraq - 2
- Another View - Rick Santorum: When Israel needs our help, we have to be there - 0
- Thomas Sowell: Liberal urban police policies won't quell riots - 0
- Another View -- Frank Guinta: I am uniquely qualified to represent NH in Congress - 12
- Deroy Murdock: The indictment of Rick Perry is bizarre and unfounded - 0
- Another View - Marc Champion: A strong terror policy would cure Obama's golf woes - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- On Baseball: Fisher Cats manager Meacham learned a few things, too - 0
- First and 10: Old No. 1 begins as new No. 1 - 0
- NHIAA Girls' Soccer Preview: All eyes on Bedford, Exeter - 0
- Another View -- Dan McGuire: We Free Staters are not some threat to be feared - 0
- Taxpayer rights: Left, right should restore them - 0
- Hooksett highs: A good multiple choice test - 0
- No paper Monday - 0
- Patriots' Garoppolo solid, but Giants eke out 16-13 win in preseason finale - 0
- Education business tax credit program upheld - 0
Enter to win tickets to see Paula Poundstone
Win tickets to see Steven Wright
Where is Shaheen? Hiding from you
Weekly brother gave police wrong name
Hooksett highs: A good multiple choice test