Sep 25, 2014
Sep 18, 2014
Sep 4, 2014
Aug 28, 2014
Milford arson case takes odd twist at hearing
Carr, 50, was arrested last month and charged with conspiracy to commit arson, a class A felony, and witness tampering, a class B felony. Carr, who owns a three-story building on the Milford Oval, is accused of plotting to burn down the building, which includes two apartments and two businesses, in order to get insurance money.
At Carr's probable cause hearing, a formality that requires the prosecution to show that there's enough evidence to send a case to a superior court grand jury, Detective Sgt. Kevin Furlong testified that Carr's tenant, Maureen Riley, who lives in the third-floor apartment, told another tenant that Carr had offered her $7,000 to go away for a couple of weeks because Carr intended to torch the building.
Riley, according to Furlong, then told Rick Fells of Carr's alleged plot, and Fells, who owns a smoke shop on the first floor of the building, immediately went to police.
Furlong testified that an investigation was started immediately and revealed that Carr had been putting everything in place in order to commit arson, including calling her insurance company to make sure she had adequate coverage on the building, moving boxes and personal items from the building to her mother's house, and even checking with Fells to ensure that he had liability insurance. Carr also secured a court order in early January in order to get access to the basement of the building through Fells' business when he wasn't there because the only other access point was blocked off.
Carr assured Riley that the fire would be started while everyone was out of the building, and said she had committed arson once before and gotten away with it, said Furlong. Carr's mother's house in Mont Vernon burned in 1990, said Furlong, and though the cause of the fire was never determined, it appeared that the fuse box in the home had been tampered with.
Police also interviewed Carr's boyfriend, Connie Kelleher, who said Carr told him she intended to "cook the building," according to Furlong. The plan was to set fire to the basement and let it consume the building from there. Carr owes $92,000 on the mortgage of the building, which is assessed at $193,000 but insured for close to $400,000.
Kelleher was contacted by the police during the investigation and in taped phone conversations between Carr and Kelleher, obtained by warrant from the Attorney General's Office, Furlong said Carr tried to convince Kelleher to tell police that Riley had threatened to burn down the building.
Carr's attorney, William Keefe, attempted to show that though the building was insured, the bank or the insurance company could demand that she rebuild and thus prevent her from benefitting from the fire. Furlong also said, under Keefe's cross-examination, that Carr had no prior criminal record.
Then Keefe made the unusual move of having his client testify, something that is allowed under the law but very rarely happens at probable cause hearings. During her testimony, Carr insisted it was her tenant, Maureen Riley, who was plotting to burn down the building. Carr said Riley was angry at her because she wouldn't allow Riley's daughter and children to move into the apartment.
Carr said she would never have plotted to commit arson because her children worked next door at Ralph's Service Station, owned by her ex-husband Ralph Porter, and she knew the vapors from the gas tanks could ignite.
"My son works there, and he's sometimes there until midnight," said Carr. "I never would have done this."
As Carr's testimony ended, Judge Martha Crocker quickly found that the state's burden of proof had been met and ordered the case sent up to the grand jury.
Though Carr's attorney argued for $75,000 personal recognizance bail, Crocker left the original condition of $75,000 cash-only bail in place.
"The danger to the community is pronounced in this matter," said Crocker, because the building is located in a densely populated area next door to a gas station.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Strafford County inmate facing charges of thefts from vehicles - 0
- Manchester Crimewatch: Man charged with assault says he was trying to break up a fight - 0
- Nashua man was not Mirandized following shooting by police, court documents say - 0
- Man arrested for speeds over 100 mph on Everett Turnpike - 0
- Nashua man accused of cutting wife’s throat committed to psychiatric hospital - 1
- Two may have stabbed each other in Concord parking garage incident, police say - 0
- Manchester joyride in a stolen truck lands two in handcuffs - 0
- License revocations for DWI announced - 0
- Crosstown Variety Store robbed in Manchester - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Review of West High intruder case to be behind closed doors - 0
- Another View -- Daniel Barrick: Manchester's schools face some serious challenges - 0
- Racism in Lincoln? Looks more like ignorance - 0
- Representing whom? Jeanne Shaheen, leftist icon - 0
- Chiefly, Pats are horrible in Monday night blowout in K.C. - 0
- NHIAA Roundup: Double-overtime goal sends Goffstown past John Stark in boys' soccer - 0
- UNH gridders jump one spot in national polls - 0
- Dave D'Onofrio's Sox Beat: Offseason needs aplenty - 0
- NHIAA Field Hockey: Merrill's hat trick lifts Winnacunnet - 0
Dredging planned for Milford's Osgood Pond
UNH gridders jump one spot in national polls
Racism in Lincoln? Looks more like ignorance
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917