Home » Opinion » Editorials
'Problematic': The virtue of the city tax cap
Speaking at last Wednesday's meeting of the city Charter Commission, Sanders said, "This dual cap and revenue equation, which is so hard and arcane, will be a challenge in the future, a very serious challenge."
He continued: "As long as state funding stays flat and expenses keep going up, if we can't raise property taxes - if the aldermen don't have the option to do that, or don't have the political will - there will have to be a cost reduction in other areas."
To sum up: The cap, twice approved by voters, limits both tax and spending increases. That, says Sanders, will result in "a cost reduction" if "aldermen don't have the option" or "the political will" to override the cap. To this, one might add, "Yes, and?"
Before Frank Guinta was elected mayor, Manchester taxpayers endured six straight years of tax increases.
In just the four years from 2001-2005, Manchester's tax rate rose by 20.5 percent. Angered by the arrogance of a city government that asserted without apology that spending, and the taxes to fund it, simply had to rise every year, voters approved a tax and spending cap. A coalition of unions and pro-spending activists got the cap struck down in court, and voters quickly approved another one. This in a city dominated politically by Democrats.
The cap does allow spending and taxes to exceed the rate of inflation and population growth - but only by the vote of 10 aldermen. Voters installed that emergency release valve for ... emergencies. Sanders suggested dropping the required supermajority from 10 to 8, thus loosening the valve. In a city that routinely elects more than eight members of one political party to the Board of Mayor and Aldermen, this would change the cap from a restraint to a suggestion.
The voters put the cap in place - twice - to do exactly what Sanders complains it will do: force city officials to cut the budget so the people don't have to cut theirs.
The tax cap is "problematic" for city officials by design - because without it, constant tax increases are problematic for everyone else.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Heroes all? A word cheapened by overuse - 10
- Punch line: The NFL blows it - 3
- Distracted legislating: Our baseless cellphone ban - 37
- Workplace abuse: Governor gets one right - 0
- Fleeing hostile states: Gun makers will travel - 14
- Voting in NH: Not just for NH residents - 28
- Protesting information: Picket sign o' the times - 6
- Seabrook's message: No one above the law here - 3
- 'Economic patriotism'; tax rates and border jumpers - 6
READER COMMENTS: 0
- NH Shrine team girds for Vt.'s ground attack - 0
- On Baseball: Fishers prospects sweat out deadline day - 0
- Goffstown ready for LL regional tourney - 0
- Dave D'Onofrio's Sox Beat -- Message is clear: Offense needs boost - 0
- Marina dealers say boat sales are on the rise - 0
- Another View -- Gilles Bissonnette: Why voting in NH is not reserved for state residents - 0
- John Stossel: Healthy profits? - 0
- Clinton vs. speech: Bullying first; what next? - 0
- Another View - Charles Lane: Your money is being spent by dead people - 0
Havenstein says he has always opposed Obamacare, though company he led was paid to implement parts of it
George Will: A conservative internationalism
Heroes all? A word cheapened by overuse
Another View -- Gilles Bissonnette, William Christie, Alan Cronheim and Benjamin Siracusa Hillman: Why voting in NH is not reserved for state residents
Mark Hayward's City Matters: Market Basket workers' outlook challenges the skeptics among us
Market Basket customers mobilize
Police held Abby suspect's guns
Punch line: The NFL blows it