All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In


A reactionary ban: The prison privatization option

Supporters of commuter rail in New Hampshire want to spend $3.6 million of taxpayer money to study the benefits of commuter rail because, they say, commuter rail is so beneficial. Conversely, Rep. Timothy Robertson, D-Keene, has introduced a bill to go ahead and ban private prisons, though a state-commissioned study of the value of private prisons is not due until later this month. If so much taxpayer money were not involved, this would be funny.

New Hampshire's prisons are crowded, say corrections officials. Private prisons provide the state with one option for housing more inmates at a lower cost.

Also, if a New Hampshire prison burns or otherwise has to be evacuated suddenly, private prisons are there to take our inmates in an emergency, Corrections Commissioner William Wrenn says.

At a legislative hearing last week, Wrenn testified against Robertson's House Bill 443, which would ban private prisons in New Hampshire. Wrenn is no booster of the private prison industry. He just understands what some legislators do not: that contracting with private businesses can, at least in some cases, provide the Department of Corrections a cost-effective way to provide its public service.

Privatization might not be right for most of New Hampshire's prisons. But the option should be generally available. An outright ban on private prisons would be irrational, reactionary and irresponsible.



Comments


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment


You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.



More Editorials

NH priorities: Let's stop pretending in Concord

   1   Editorials PUBLISHED - 6:34 pm 3/28  

Cheap stunt by UNH: Broderick is owed an apology

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 6:34 pm 3/28  

American pride: The dance heard 'round the world

   1   Editorials PUBLISHED - 6:34 pm 3/28  

Maple Weekend: How to live large in NH

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:22 pm 3/26  

Cries of wolf: Another sound of spring

   10   Editorials PUBLISHED - 2:23 am 3/26  

Disciplining kids: Not the cop's job

   2   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:09 pm 3/25  

City cost driver: Yarger-Decker still in place

   3   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:52 pm 3/24  

A DOT budget: Hara-kiri on the highway

   13   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:52 pm 3/24  

Tracking cellphones? Not in New Hampshire

   18   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:32 pm 3/23  


NH Angle - Editorials