All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In

A reactionary ban: The prison privatization option

Supporters of commuter rail in New Hampshire want to spend $3.6 million of taxpayer money to study the benefits of commuter rail because, they say, commuter rail is so beneficial. Conversely, Rep. Timothy Robertson, D-Keene, has introduced a bill to go ahead and ban private prisons, though a state-commissioned study of the value of private prisons is not due until later this month. If so much taxpayer money were not involved, this would be funny.

New Hampshire's prisons are crowded, say corrections officials. Private prisons provide the state with one option for housing more inmates at a lower cost.

Also, if a New Hampshire prison burns or otherwise has to be evacuated suddenly, private prisons are there to take our inmates in an emergency, Corrections Commissioner William Wrenn says.

At a legislative hearing last week, Wrenn testified against Robertson's House Bill 443, which would ban private prisons in New Hampshire. Wrenn is no booster of the private prison industry. He just understands what some legislators do not: that contracting with private businesses can, at least in some cases, provide the Department of Corrections a cost-effective way to provide its public service.

Privatization might not be right for most of New Hampshire's prisons. But the option should be generally available. An outright ban on private prisons would be irrational, reactionary and irresponsible.


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail

More Editorials

Getting real: NH should tell feds to buzz off

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:48 pm 10/03  

Hassan's budget? Stealing credit again

   14   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:11 pm 10/01  

Dumping NH: Be careful what you wish for

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:22 pm 9/30  

Unethical aldermen: Will the people respond?

   14   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:32 pm 9/29  

Falling behind: Taxes and the world

   28   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:33 pm 9/29  

'Culture of protection': Unaccountable bureaucracies

   11   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:46 pm 9/28  

Overdose honesty: NH will need more of it

   1   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:41 pm 9/27  

NH Angle - Editorials