All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In


Public works: Nashua meeting time must change


Nashua's Board of Public Works meetings do not work for the public. One alderman wants to change that. Surprisingly, he has met considerable resistance.

The city's Board of Public Works, which oversees major public works projects, meets at 2 p.m. on select Thursdays. The board settled some disagreement about that meeting time last December when it voted to continue its afternoon gatherings. At least, it settled the disagreement on paper. Alderman at-large James Donchess has not let it go, though, and that is good for the public.

Regarding the meeting schedule, Donchess has pointed out the obvious: holding meetings during weekday work hours reduces public participation. Not only that, it restricts the pool of people available to serve on the board.

"Too many of these positions run uncontested because a large number of people cannot even consider taking time off from their employment on a regular basis," Donchess said. "I just think it would be better for 90 percent of the people or more if the meetings were held in the evening."

To that end, Donchess has proposed a charter revision that would require the board to meet no earlier than 6 p.m.

Local public boards should always hold their regular meetings outside of regular work hours, as most do. That increases dramatically the public's ability to participate. Donchess is on the right side here, and it is disappointing that he has found so little support from other public officials that he has felt the need to turn to the people with a proposed charter amendment. It should not take that to set a reasonable meeting time for a public board.


Comments


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment


You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.



More Editorials

Playing at Gill: It is worth the price

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:48 pm 5/04  

Uber and taxis: Finding the real problem

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:48 pm 5/04  

Heroes and angels: New Hampshire has some of each

   1   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:48 pm 5/03  

Reckless hiking: This one takes the cake

   2   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:48 pm 5/03  

The casino vote: Several takeaways for NH

   18   Editorials PUBLISHED - 4:55 pm 5/02  

Fox News as foil: It is getting a bit old

   36   Editorials PUBLISHED - 4:55 pm 5/02  

An Uber rider: State Rep. Bouldin’s view

   32   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:59 pm 4/29  


NH Angle - Editorials