Home » Opinion » Editorials
February 14. 2013 11:21PM
It is inadvisable to base a budget, whether a household's or a state's, on income that is unlikely to materialize. Alas, Gov. Maggie Hassan has done that. Again.
When Hassan presented her two-year state budget on Thursday, she called it "fiscally responsible" and said she based it on "conservative projections" of revenue. That simply is not so.
For starters, the governor included $80 million in casino licensing revenue in the two-year budget, $40 million for each year. New Hampshire, of course, has no casino. Hassan is betting $80 million of her budget on legislators passing a casino gambling bill by July - and at least one casino paying $80 million in licensing fees to the state. So many things could go wrong during that process. Although the Senate probably would pass expanded gambling, whether the House would is an open question. Including that revenue in the state budget is hardly using "conservative" revenue estimates.
Hassan assumes a $29 million increase in tobacco tax revenue in the next fiscal year alone, from a 30-cent increase in the tobacco tax (restoration of the 10-cents cut last year, plus another 20 cents). She campaigned on restoring the 10 cents, but that would not bring enough revenue so she's tripling the tax hike.
She also assumes that business taxes will bring in $16 million more next year than in the current fiscal year. She makes this assumption after the U.S. economy shrank in the last quarter, and as President Obama proposes more tax hikes at the federal level and an increase in the minimum wage.
These three questionable revenue projections alone account for $85 million in just the first year of her budget. Granite Staters should have expected such magical budgeting. As a state senator, Hassan led the effort to count on revenue from a new tax on limited liability companies, an illegal raid on a private insurance fund, and dozens of tax and fee increases.
We had hoped she would have learned her lesson. Alas, Gov. Hassan is little better than Sen. Hassan. She would rather spend money we don't have by inventing new ways of gathering it than do the truly fiscally responsible thing and make state government live within its means.
Maggie's money: A wishful state budget
When Hassan presented her two-year state budget on Thursday, she called it "fiscally responsible" and said she based it on "conservative projections" of revenue. That simply is not so.
For starters, the governor included $80 million in casino licensing revenue in the two-year budget, $40 million for each year. New Hampshire, of course, has no casino. Hassan is betting $80 million of her budget on legislators passing a casino gambling bill by July - and at least one casino paying $80 million in licensing fees to the state. So many things could go wrong during that process. Although the Senate probably would pass expanded gambling, whether the House would is an open question. Including that revenue in the state budget is hardly using "conservative" revenue estimates.
Hassan assumes a $29 million increase in tobacco tax revenue in the next fiscal year alone, from a 30-cent increase in the tobacco tax (restoration of the 10-cents cut last year, plus another 20 cents). She campaigned on restoring the 10 cents, but that would not bring enough revenue so she's tripling the tax hike.
She also assumes that business taxes will bring in $16 million more next year than in the current fiscal year. She makes this assumption after the U.S. economy shrank in the last quarter, and as President Obama proposes more tax hikes at the federal level and an increase in the minimum wage.
These three questionable revenue projections alone account for $85 million in just the first year of her budget. Granite Staters should have expected such magical budgeting. As a state senator, Hassan led the effort to count on revenue from a new tax on limited liability companies, an illegal raid on a private insurance fund, and dozens of tax and fee increases.
We had hoped she would have learned her lesson. Alas, Gov. Hassan is little better than Sen. Hassan. She would rather spend money we don't have by inventing new ways of gathering it than do the truly fiscally responsible thing and make state government live within its means.
- Charles Arlinghaus: On Medicaid expansion, the right answer is, 'not yet' - 2
- Deroy Murdock: A bloated state necessarily bullies, as the IRS did - 2
- Kathy Sullivan: The IRS scandal exposes flaw behind tax-exempt politicking - 24
- Pat Buchanan: For what should Americans die? - 1
- Your Turn, NH: Common Core will be a costly burden for students, taxpayers - 10
- Jonah Goldberg: The IRS was only following Obama's lead - 15
- Another View -- Glenn Normandeau: Protecting endangered non-game species a NH success story - 1
- Charles Krauthammer: Redacted truth, subjunctive outrage - 0
- David Harsanyi: Get the IRS out of the speech business altogether - 10
Another View: Amendments to the Senate casino bill make it worth passing
READER COMMENTS: 3- Rochester man facing up to 30 years in prison for brutal assault - 0
- Man who confronts burglar in Nashua gets bit - 0
- Police say Nashua man struck woman with Jeep - 0
- Last-minute lobbying frantic as House prepares for casino vote - 1
- Pease chosen to receive new KC-46A refueling tanker; to bring 100 jobs - 3
- FBI agent kills Florida man during questioning about Marathon bombing suspect - 1
- Police seek man they say passed counterfeit bill at Manchester mall - 1
- Lightning strikes home in Exeter - 0
- For now, no more breakfasts in Manchester's Veterans Park - 11
House passes auto dealers bill of rights
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available



