Home » News » Politics » Town Meetings
March 08. 2013 10:03AM
WINDHAM - A long-awaited new contract for Windham’s teachers was the topic of much discussion at Tuesday night’s school board meeting.
In response to letters written from citizens concerned about the contract’s costs, school board member Stephanie Wimmer, who served on the district’s negotiation committee, offered an explanation of the collective bargaining process and the new contract heading before voters Tuesday.
Wimmer said a team consisting of board members, administrators and legal counsel assisted them in the bargaining process.
“We wanted to make sure we were both rewarding our teachers and keeping our responsibility to our taxpayers,” Wimmer said.
Since the July 2011 expiration of the Windham teachers' current contract, the laws have changed, Wimmer noted.
"One of the big changes we've seen legislatively is health care reform so we’re keeping an eye to those changes," she said.
A new feature of the contract makes provisions for individual teacher ratings and opportunities for high-performing teachers to earn bonuses.
Teachers receive an extensive evaluation every three years in the Windham district and under the new contract, those who score high would be eligible for one-time monetary bonuses, which would be separate from their base salaries.
"We did our budget hoping a lot of teachers would be distinguished, but it's not enforced," Wimmer said.
One cost-saving method proposed for next year includes increased co-pays for prescriptions, which Wimmer said could save the district $670,000 next year.
Employees will still have several plan options to choose from depending on their family size and budgets.
The board urged public support of the contract.
"We have some of the most phenomenal educators in this district," Wimmer said. "Even without a contract for the past two years, they haven’t wavered in their commitment to our children."
If voters at the March 12 polls pass the three-year contract, Article 3 would increase the budget by $107,259 next year and by $563,473 the following year.
Next year’s residential tax impact of Article 3 would be five cents per thousand dollars.
Voters will also decide on Article 4, a three-year contract with the district’s instructional assistants.
That contract would increase the budget by $64,594 next year and $82,904 the following year if passed.
Employees working 30 hours per week or more would also receive $200 towards health insurance for a $200 buyout with proof of coverage.
If passed, Article 4 would have a three-cent per thousand-dollar tax impact.
AGuilmet@newstote.com
Teacher's contract headed to Windham polls
In response to letters written from citizens concerned about the contract’s costs, school board member Stephanie Wimmer, who served on the district’s negotiation committee, offered an explanation of the collective bargaining process and the new contract heading before voters Tuesday.
Wimmer said a team consisting of board members, administrators and legal counsel assisted them in the bargaining process.
“We wanted to make sure we were both rewarding our teachers and keeping our responsibility to our taxpayers,” Wimmer said.
Since the July 2011 expiration of the Windham teachers' current contract, the laws have changed, Wimmer noted.
"One of the big changes we've seen legislatively is health care reform so we’re keeping an eye to those changes," she said.
A new feature of the contract makes provisions for individual teacher ratings and opportunities for high-performing teachers to earn bonuses.
Teachers receive an extensive evaluation every three years in the Windham district and under the new contract, those who score high would be eligible for one-time monetary bonuses, which would be separate from their base salaries.
"We did our budget hoping a lot of teachers would be distinguished, but it's not enforced," Wimmer said.
One cost-saving method proposed for next year includes increased co-pays for prescriptions, which Wimmer said could save the district $670,000 next year.
Employees will still have several plan options to choose from depending on their family size and budgets.
The board urged public support of the contract.
"We have some of the most phenomenal educators in this district," Wimmer said. "Even without a contract for the past two years, they haven’t wavered in their commitment to our children."
If voters at the March 12 polls pass the three-year contract, Article 3 would increase the budget by $107,259 next year and by $563,473 the following year.
Next year’s residential tax impact of Article 3 would be five cents per thousand dollars.
Voters will also decide on Article 4, a three-year contract with the district’s instructional assistants.
That contract would increase the budget by $64,594 next year and $82,904 the following year if passed.
Employees working 30 hours per week or more would also receive $200 towards health insurance for a $200 buyout with proof of coverage.
If passed, Article 4 would have a three-cent per thousand-dollar tax impact.
AGuilmet@newstote.com
- Disengaged: Obama's lousy excuse - 14
- Underestimating NH: Gun control picks two wrong targets - 27
- Roaming jihadis: A terrorist visits Manchester - 3
- Athletes and PE: Give them credit for sports - 7
- The EPA's friend: It has a loyal ally in Shea-Porter - 16
- Leading vs. following: Ayotte, Shaheen and the polls - 24
- The cupcake police: Stop! In the name of lard! - 15
- Page One Editorial: Obama is right - 27
- Taxed tips: Another NH revenue grab - 9
Not so merry: Giving Robin Hood a bad name
READER COMMENTS: 4- Two sustained minor injuries in Rochester crash Sunday - 0
- Boat crash in Tuftonboro investigated - 0
- Manchester alderman urges review of police phone use - 12
- Updated: Man fatally shot on Manchester street; neighbors shocked - 0
- Nashua mayor to recommend Bennett for corporation counsel - 0
- Claremont group disputes incinerator plant's permit - 0
- Goffstown artisan gives new face to Wolfeboro tower - 0
- Katie McQuaid's Scene in Manchester: Kiwanis and the kids - 0
- Town may have to fix grave error - 2
Firefighters say casino revenue needed for 'public safety'
READER COMMENTS: 2
Sorry, no question available



