Home » News » Politics » Town Meetings
March 08. 2013 10:03AM
WINDHAM - A long-awaited new contract for Windham’s teachers was the topic of much discussion at Tuesday night’s school board meeting.
In response to letters written from citizens concerned about the contract’s costs, school board member Stephanie Wimmer, who served on the district’s negotiation committee, offered an explanation of the collective bargaining process and the new contract heading before voters Tuesday.
Wimmer said a team consisting of board members, administrators and legal counsel assisted them in the bargaining process.
“We wanted to make sure we were both rewarding our teachers and keeping our responsibility to our taxpayers,” Wimmer said.
Since the July 2011 expiration of the Windham teachers' current contract, the laws have changed, Wimmer noted.
"One of the big changes we've seen legislatively is health care reform so we’re keeping an eye to those changes," she said.
A new feature of the contract makes provisions for individual teacher ratings and opportunities for high-performing teachers to earn bonuses.
Teachers receive an extensive evaluation every three years in the Windham district and under the new contract, those who score high would be eligible for one-time monetary bonuses, which would be separate from their base salaries.
"We did our budget hoping a lot of teachers would be distinguished, but it's not enforced," Wimmer said.
One cost-saving method proposed for next year includes increased co-pays for prescriptions, which Wimmer said could save the district $670,000 next year.
Employees will still have several plan options to choose from depending on their family size and budgets.
The board urged public support of the contract.
"We have some of the most phenomenal educators in this district," Wimmer said. "Even without a contract for the past two years, they haven’t wavered in their commitment to our children."
If voters at the March 12 polls pass the three-year contract, Article 3 would increase the budget by $107,259 next year and by $563,473 the following year.
Next year’s residential tax impact of Article 3 would be five cents per thousand dollars.
Voters will also decide on Article 4, a three-year contract with the district’s instructional assistants.
That contract would increase the budget by $64,594 next year and $82,904 the following year if passed.
Employees working 30 hours per week or more would also receive $200 towards health insurance for a $200 buyout with proof of coverage.
If passed, Article 4 would have a three-cent per thousand-dollar tax impact.
AGuilmet@newstote.com
Teacher's contract headed to Windham polls
In response to letters written from citizens concerned about the contract’s costs, school board member Stephanie Wimmer, who served on the district’s negotiation committee, offered an explanation of the collective bargaining process and the new contract heading before voters Tuesday.
Wimmer said a team consisting of board members, administrators and legal counsel assisted them in the bargaining process.
“We wanted to make sure we were both rewarding our teachers and keeping our responsibility to our taxpayers,” Wimmer said.
Since the July 2011 expiration of the Windham teachers' current contract, the laws have changed, Wimmer noted.
"One of the big changes we've seen legislatively is health care reform so we’re keeping an eye to those changes," she said.
A new feature of the contract makes provisions for individual teacher ratings and opportunities for high-performing teachers to earn bonuses.
Teachers receive an extensive evaluation every three years in the Windham district and under the new contract, those who score high would be eligible for one-time monetary bonuses, which would be separate from their base salaries.
"We did our budget hoping a lot of teachers would be distinguished, but it's not enforced," Wimmer said.
One cost-saving method proposed for next year includes increased co-pays for prescriptions, which Wimmer said could save the district $670,000 next year.
Employees will still have several plan options to choose from depending on their family size and budgets.
The board urged public support of the contract.
"We have some of the most phenomenal educators in this district," Wimmer said. "Even without a contract for the past two years, they haven’t wavered in their commitment to our children."
If voters at the March 12 polls pass the three-year contract, Article 3 would increase the budget by $107,259 next year and by $563,473 the following year.
Next year’s residential tax impact of Article 3 would be five cents per thousand dollars.
Voters will also decide on Article 4, a three-year contract with the district’s instructional assistants.
That contract would increase the budget by $64,594 next year and $82,904 the following year if passed.
Employees working 30 hours per week or more would also receive $200 towards health insurance for a $200 buyout with proof of coverage.
If passed, Article 4 would have a three-cent per thousand-dollar tax impact.
AGuilmet@newstote.com
- NHIAA boxscores, summaries for May 14, 2013 - 0
- Manchester's Gill Stadium nearing centenial rededication, still going strong - 0
- Red Sox lose to Rangers - 0
- Glenn, Nolan power Fisher Cats to win - 0
- All done: Monarchs elminated from AHL playoffs three games to one - 0
- NH College Roundup: Evans in Pats' rookie camp - 0
- Derryfield defeats Central girls in lacrosse - 0
- High school action - 0
- College Notebook: Eventful week for Northeastern's Lyons brothers from Bedford - 0
Former NASCAR driver Trickle dead in apparent suicide
READER COMMENTS: 0- Teen hurt in Amherst boating crash - 0
- Portsmouth police DWI roadblock stops 179 motorists yielding 4 arrests - 0
- NHIAA Tennis: Bedford is championship-focused - 0
- John Habib's City Sports: Tourney time nears for JVs, too - 0
- NHIAA Scoreboard, May 17, 2013 - 0
- NHIAA Roundup: Hanover's Cravero hurls another no-hitter - 0
- Lawyer says Northern Pass in 'a corner' - 3
- Fisher Cats score in 9th to win - 0
- Sox edge Twins in 10, 3-2 - 0
Robber escapes with drugs from Keene CVS
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available



