All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In

The joystick medal: An insult to combat veterans

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel needs a dictionary. In a letter to Sen. Pat Toomey last Thursday, Hagel expressed this opinion of the Pentagon's new Distinguished Warfare Medal, a non-combat medal created for drone pilots, which will outrank the Bronze Star and Purple Heart.

"It recognizes a specific type of contribution that is vital to the defense of our nation. It in no way degrades or minimizes our nation's other important awards or the tremendous sacrifices of our men and women who earn these prestigious recognitions."

Merriam-Webster defines "degrade" as "to lower in grade, rank, or status." The Distinguished Warfare Medal would bump the Bronze Star and Purple Heart down the ranks of military medals, from 9th and 10th, respectively, to 10th and 11th. It would degrade those medals, literally.

Hagel inherited this slight to the valor of our combat forces from his predecessor, Leon Panetta, who approved it. Panetta's Feb. 13 letter announcing the medal stated that it was created specifically to rank above the Bronze Star (it will be just below the Distinguished Flying Cross).

After pressure from some senators (including Kelly Ayotte and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire) and veterans groups, Hagel said this week he would review the new medal. We hope he will not have to be guided by hand to the right conclusion on every major decision. Judging from his confirmation hearing and his tone-deaf response to this issue, that seems like a real possibility.


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail

More Editorials

Shutdown showoffs: Grandstanding, not governing

   8   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:01 pm 9/20  

Polls as big news: Easier than reporting issues

   2   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:31 pm 9/19  

A budget win that conservatives almost killed

   4   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:31 pm 9/19  

George F. Will: Pope Francis' fact-free flamboyance

   12   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:31 pm 9/19  

School guarantee? Manchester's trust problem

   10   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:05 pm 9/17  

Concealed carry NH falls behind

   61   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:05 pm 9/17  

Fighting heroin: What about the supply?

   8   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:22 pm 9/16  

Reducing insurers: NH has had enough of that

   18   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:22 pm 9/16  

A tax cut deal: How both sides can win

   8   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:35 pm 9/15  

Obama's bad lunches: Londonderry dines alone

   24   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:35 pm 9/15  

NH Angle - Editorials