Sep 4, 2014
Aug 28, 2014
Aug 21, 2014
Aug 14, 2014
Ponzi scheme victims may recoup some of their losses
The Senate Thursday approved Senate Bill 180, which establishes a fund from access revenues from several state regulatory agencies and settlements to repay the 150 lenders who lost at least $33 million when FRM closed abruptly in 2009.
Co-sponsored by Senate President Peter Bragdon, R-Milford, the fund would be in place until all the claims are satisfied.
"This was a complete failure of state government. There were over 70 violations (of state laws) over nine years," Bragdon said. "The state did see something wrong and the state chose not to do anything."
In the FRM case, investors and others contacted state regulators at the Bureau of Securities, the Attorney General's Office and the Banking Department and those complaints and concerns were ignored.
"I think we have crossed the line where state recovery of assistance should be considered," Bragdon told his colleagues.
Senate Minority Leader Sylvia Larsen, D-Concord, expressed concern the bill would set a precedent which would open the state up to others seeking reimbursement when the state does not live up to its duties.
She also noted the state is not likely to fully reimburse the victims of FRM, while the bill would lead them to believe that.
And she said the money going into the fund would go into the state's general fund where it would be used for a higher priority. But bill co-sponsor Sen. Lou D'Allesandro, D-Manchester, called the bill a reasonable way to help people who were severely damaged.
He said lawmakers need to stand by their convictions and if that sets a precedent, so be it.
"It is important for us to recognize it is our job to right wrongs," D'Allesandro said.
The FRM scandal was investigated by a legislative committee, as well as the state agencies involved and by the secretary of state's office.
Numerous bills have been introduced in the last three or four years concerning the FRM scandal, including bills to establish a restitution fund for the victims.
Attempts to establish funds in the past have been unsuccessful.
Scott Farah, the former president of FRM of Meredith, is serving 15 years in federal prison on wire and mail fraud charges, and his co-conspirator, Donald Dodge, who was president of CL&M, a mortgage servicing company, is serving six years for wire fraud.
READER COMMENTS: 3
- Gunman hits Circle K convenience store in Durham - 0
- Nashua man charged in domestic knife threat - 0
- UPDATED: Manchester carpenter, 51, arraigned in Nashua child sexual assault - 0
- Pair accused in Hampstead home invasion also face witness tampering charges - 0
- Widow of chiropractor killed this summer says fatal shooting was no accident - 3
- Alleged accomplice in brutal Bedford home invasion, attack on doctor and wife, says his testimony was coerced - 0
- Man claims rights were violated during investigation - 0
- DWI license revocations - 0
- Salem man arrested for alleged bathroom videotaping - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- UPS driver charged in hit-and-run at Merrimack business - 0
- Bella, a chihuahua mix, is still missing in Auburn - 0
- Suicide car bomber kills 3 foreign troops in Afghan capital; Taliban claims responsibility - 0
- City officials to review proposed 'spice' ban - 1
- Manchester's Delana Curtis is left out in the cold - 0
- Another View -- Sharon Day: The Democrats' claim to be the party for women is just not believable - 38
- Dave D'Onofrio's Patriots Notebook: Brady a realist - 0
- Burning rubber: And public dollars - 0
- Obama to announce ramped-up efforts to beat Ebola - 0
DWI license revocations
Win tickets to see Kip Moore
Mexican man pleads guilty in international conspiracy to traffic hundreds of pounds of cocaine
Another View -- Sharon Day: The Democrats' claim to be the party for women is just not believable
Seabrook mom pleads not guilty by reason of insanity to attempted murder of her two children
Alleged accomplice in brutal Bedford home invasion, attack on doctor and wife, says his testimony was coerced
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917