Home » Opinion » Editorials
Carbon fantasy: Don't hike the RGGI tax
RGGI is a pact in which the New England states and three others agree to limit carbon emissions by law. The states then sell to power producers credits that allow those producers to emit specific amounts of carbon. Producers thereby pay for their emissions, giving them an incentive for reduction.
The current RGGI emissions cap is 165 million tons a year. The RGGI states are producing nowhere near that much carbon - not because of RGGI, but because of the marketplace. Cleaner-burning natural gas is cheaper than coal, and a big movement to gas in the past several years has reduced emissions. So has the economy. Less economic activity means less demand for power.
All of this means that the states don't have the RGGI windfall they desired.
Those emissions credits meant big bucks for states, which would then spend the money on energy efficiency projects. With little demand for the credits, the price for them has fallen, and states are out millions. But politicians always have plans for obtaining the cash they want to spend.
The RGGI states want to lower the carbon emissions standards from 165 million tons a year to 91 million. Why? To raise the price of the credits.
This will further increase electric utility rates, which RGGI boosters acknowledge. But it won't have any noticeable impact on the climate. India, China and other growing economies are belching out so much carbon that any reduction caused by RGGI limits will be overwhelmed. We will pay higher rates not to cool the planet, which this change will not cause, but to give the states bigger "energy conservation" slush funds.
The state Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee has approved the bill to authorize this RGGI change. It already has passed the House. The Senate is the only hope for avoiding this rate-hiking scheme. Senators should do their jobs and protect New Hampshire residents from this needless tax increase.
READER COMMENTS: 3
- Burning rubber: And public dollars - 0
- Hassan was right: 'Bullying' bill goes too far - 12
- Strategery: A war by any other name - 29
- Freeh dumb: Favoritism in Vt.? - 6
- Public be damned: Litchfield latest example - 2
- NH's 9/11 victims: We cannot forget - 0
- Celebrating Stark: And America, in Manchester - 0
- NH's Obamabots: Taking their cues from party bosses - 57
- Spending & voting: MayDay's wasted money - 5
READER COMMENTS: 5
- Charles Arlinghaus: NH's job problem needs more than one fix - 3
- USNH's raw deal: Part deux - 2
- College Sports Roundup: NEC's Locke scores twice in soccer win - 0
- NHIAA Roundup: Campbell, Jutras blank Gilford - 0
- Pirates stay hot, blank Red Sox - 0
- Londonderry police to open station to residents - 0
- Man accused of raping 13-year old in Nashua - 2
- NHIAA Golf: Crusaders teeing up special year - 0
- New Nashua computer curriculum stresses exam, lifetime skills - 0
Man accused of raping 13-year old in Nashua
Seabrook mom pleads not guilty by reason of insanity to attempted murder of her two children
Alleged accomplice in brutal Bedford home invasion, attack on doctor and wife, says his testimony was coerced
Win tickets to see Demi Lovato
Another View -- Bill Duncan: What did the NH Supreme Court really say about private school funding?
Every vote counts: Here is the proof
USNH's raw deal: Part deux
Keene man charged with assault on 2-year-old
Labor fines proposed on school project