Aug 21, 2014
Aug 14, 2014
Jul 24, 2014
Jul 16, 2014
Trial of man charged with strangling UNH sophmore may still be a year away
Both sides were in Strafford County Superior Court on Tuesday for a preliminary pre-trial conference in the murder case against Mazzaglia to try and set a schedule for trial.
In April, a grand jury indicted Mazzaglia on two counts of first-degree murder and one count of second-degree murder, alleging he strangled and/or suffocated Elizabeth "Lizzi" Marriott, 19, in his apartment on Oct. 9 before, during or after committing felonious sexual assault. He is facing a fourth count of hindering apprehension and/or prosecution.
He claims to have dumped the University of New Hampshire sophomore's body in the waters off the Piscataqua River later that night. Months of searching have failed to recover Marriott's body.
Mazzaglia's girlfriend, Kathryn "Kat" McDonough, 19, of Portsmouth also is facing charges of hindering apprehension and/or prosecution and tampering with a witness out of Rockingham County.
In court on Wednesday in an orange jumpsuit, Mazzaglia did not speak during the short hearing, and turned around only once to see who was in the courtroom.
The two sides are due back in court on July 31 to further set the trial schedule.
When asked after the hearing if they were concerned about their client's right to a speedy trial, defense attorney Joachim Barth said "no, we just want to try this case."
Prosecuting attorney Peter Hinckley with the attorney general's office said their concern is conflicts with other already scheduled murder trials, of which he said there are five.
After the hearing he said he had one trial in January in the northern part of the state that directly conflicts with the defense's proposed date, but could not speak for co-prosecuting attorney Geoff Ward.
"We just have some issues in terms of we have other cases we need to try, that are already scheduled for trial, murder cases as well," Hinckley said.
He said it is also not a matter of the state attorney general's office being stretched too thin.
"No, it's not a matter of being stretched too thin, it's a matter of other cases being scheduled," Hinckley said.
Judge John Lewis did agree to a number of deadlines laid out in the state's proposed schedule that were also amenable to the defense.
Hinckley told the court they have turned over most discovery to the defense already, but there is still some forensic testing they do not have access to.
He would not clarify what forensic testing they are waiting on when asked after the hearing.
Both sides anticipate jury selection taking about one week and the trial about a week and a half once it begins.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Manchester police officer finds gun in cyclist’s backpack - 2
- June graduate of St. Paul’s School indicted on sex assault charges - 0
- Police: Activist in chicken suit was warned not to pester Shaheen prior to arrest - 0
- Judge orders prosecutors to disclose more details in Portsmouth bat beating probe - 0
- Former Claremont police dispatcher waives hearing on sexual assault charges - 0
- Some sexual assault charges dismissed against Nashua caretaker - 0
- Dover man indicted in sexual assault of young girl - 0
- Rochester man facing attempted murder charge - 0
- Mother, daughter, man charged in prostitution case in Nashua - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- NH Fisher Cats slam way to win over Trenton - 0
- Officials hire principal for Golden Brook school - 0
- Seniors help students start year on the right foot, with the write stuff - 0
- Derry councilors select semi-finalists for town admin job - 0
- Plaistow begins search for new police chief - 0
- Without an exemption, Goffstown resident must pay high taxes on solar energy panels - 1
- Upcoming selectmen's meeting stirring controversy among Bow's firefighters - 1
- Manchester police to hold ‘Coffee with a Cop’ event - 0
- President Obama: Rescue attempt of NH-based journalist James Foley failed - 13
Derry to NH: Take Exit 4A
Editorial: Garcia gains Lambert lies
ISIS beheads NH journalist
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917