All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In

Which one, Senator? Was Jeanne duped or duper?

Like a panicked teenager trying to clean up after a party before her parents get home, U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen is desperate to fix the Obamacare mess she created before voters have a chance to tell her what they think of her first term.

As millions of Americans have their insurance cancelled because of the law’s onerous coverage mandates, Shaheen is in retreat. She is joining a number of Democratic colleagues to delay or repeal pieces of the Affordable Care Act.

Shaheen now wants to push the law’s Open Enrollment deadline past March 31, giving people more time to purchase insurance they don’t want on a website that doesn’t work. She also says she wants to repeal the ridiculous tax on medical devices that helps fund the ACA, but can’t explain why she ever thought taxing wheelchairs and pacemakers would make health care less expensive.

It is important to note that the ACA only passed because Shaheen and 59 Democratic senators rushed it through the Senate. Rather than consider the entirely predictable consequences of this flawed legislation, or even take the time to read it, Shaheen voted to make health care less accessible and more expensive.

Shaheen joined President Obama in peddling the promise that everyone would be able to keep their doctor and their insurance policy if they liked it. There can be only two possible explanations. Either Shaheen was lying, or she didn’t have the first clue what she voting on.

Which is it, Senator?

— Guest editorial by Grant Bosse


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail

More Editorials

Hillary, Get your guns: Sanders is voice of reason

   23   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:22 pm 10/08  

Taxing hippies: Should hybrids pay more?

   13   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:22 pm 10/08  

Chief: No repentance: Somersworth police stings drivers

   12   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:33 pm 10/07  

Filling Obama's vacuum: Can Rubio rebuild U.S. clout?

   9   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:44 pm 10/07  

Balancing budget claims: Surplus numbers hide problems

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:44 pm 10/06  

Check, please? Cheap shots on Fiorina's bio

   19   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:45 pm 10/06  

'Planned' what? Names, numbers, and abortion

   20   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:58 pm 10/05  

Merrifield for Franklin: Mayor earned fourth term

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:58 pm 10/05  

Income tax debate: It is a great one to have

   35   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:43 pm 10/04  

Getting real: NH should tell feds to buzz off

   13   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:48 pm 10/03  

NH Angle - Editorials