Home » News » Roads and Travel
I-293: A plan to make it better through Manchester
The priciest set of alternatives — now in the hands of the state Department of Transportation — would cost an estimated $148 million. The study focuses on the stretch of highway just north of Exit 5 at Granite Street to about one mile north of the Exit 7 interchange at Front Street.
One of the most well-known to commuters is congestion at the highway's interchange at Amoskeag Circle off Exit 6. Another is the tendency of drivers to weave in and out of traffic in a sharply curved section near exits 6 and 7 in a battle to gain position between the closely spaced interchanges to get on or off the highway.
At the core of the alternative proposals presented is widening I-293 from two to three lanes in each direction from Exit 5 to the area of Exit 7. That part of the project could cost $8 million to $20 million.
Planners are also looking at ways the highway can be configured to help two economic development projects in an industrial area in Goffstown and the Hackett Hill section of Manchester.
Relocating Exit 7 could cost as much as $46 million."It's a question of trade-offs," said Bill Cass, director of project development for the New Hampshire Department of Transportation. "We wouldn't want to shortchange anything, but we are going to spend a lot of resources so we want it to have sufficient design life and meet transportation needs."
The affected parts of I-293 are part of the state turnpike system. Increases in turnpike tolls — even extending the tolls to the highway as it cuts through Manchester — may need to be considered, Cass said.
The project now enters another study phase, in which the alternatives are compared to each other and against the impact on surrounding city areas. Building along the Merrimack River involves environmental issues, while widening the road could also disturb regulated historic remnants of Manchester's past.
Jan. 7 public hearing
The question of how to improve transportation without adding to the burden of taxes and fees on the public has been controversial in New Hampshire over the past year. Those involved concede that much of the coming discussion is apt to be over what the state can afford compared to what the experts think is needed.
READER COMMENTS: 2
- Mark Hayward's City Matters: Sidewalk to nowhere - 3
- Mark Hayward's City Matters: Old injury a pain for would-be firefighter - 3
- Mark Hayward's City Matters: Prescription for trouble at Hillsborough County jail - 2
- Mark Hayward's City Matters: Missing easement opens protected Manchester area to development - 0
- Mark Hayward's City Matters: Clinic neighbor worries about expanding buffer zone - 11
- Mark Hayward's City Matters: Coco leaves a void in the undercover force - 16
- Mark Hayward's City Matters: They fight to free pond for Manchester skaters - 1
- City Matters: Another storm, another chance to do your part for your city to do the right thing - 2
- City Matters: Manchester man wants apology from police - 2
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Bail set for TD Bank robbery suspect in Derry - 0
- Fetal homicide bill stopped in the Senate - 0
- Democrats worry about 'dirty tricks' - 0
- Truck pulls down power line, starts paint store blaze - 0
- No change in bail for Dover teen facing felony arson charge - 1
- Full text of the attorney general's report regarding Campbell and Pappas - 0
- No charges in Nashua 'Duck-gate' - 1
- Salem Planning Board approves hookah lounge for Main Street - 0
- Hudson woman, Nashua man accused of cooking meth - 2
Younger of two brothers convicted of murdering parents quietly released after 18 years in prison
Michigan’s ban: Sotomayor’s ‘disadvantages’