Windham teachers' contract in mediation
Mediation sessions are scheduled to begin this week, according to local school and union officials.
In October, Windham Education Association President John Hayward announced that the union had reached an impasse with the School Board during the contract negotiations process.
"While we have offered multiple solutions to the outstanding matters being negotiated, we weren't able to come to a mutual resolution," Hayward said. "As the result, we are bringing in a third party to mediate the negotiations process."
Hayward added that, "It is our sincerest wish to come to a fair and just solution that supports the continuation of excellence in education that the people of Windham expect and deserve."
School Board members declined to comment on specifics of what both sides failed to agree on.
However, board Chairman Mike Joanis said both the WEA and the School Board presented multiple proposals to one another in various attempts to reach an agreement.
Joanis said a meeting between the teachers' union and the mediator would take place on Friday.
Windham's teachers have been working without a contract since their most recent contract expired in July 2011.
Voters at the March 2013 polls rejected a warrant article for a new, three-year contract that would have increased the budget by $107,259 this year and $563,473 in the coming year.
The tax impact of the article would have amounted to 5 cents per thousand dollars this year.
A total of 2,024 citizens voted against Article 3, the collective bargaining agreement with the Windham Education Association this past March. A total of 1,650 residents favored the proposed contract.
Should an agreement be reached, voters at the March 2014 ballots would have the final say on the matter.
This year's Windham school deliberative session will take place in February, with voting to take place at the March 11 Town Meeting.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Heroes all? A word cheapened by overuse - 10
- Punch line: The NFL blows it - 3
- Distracted legislating: Our baseless cellphone ban - 37
- Workplace abuse: Governor gets one right - 0
- Fleeing hostile states: Gun makers will travel - 14
- Voting in NH: Not just for NH residents - 28
- Protesting information: Picket sign o' the times - 6
- Seabrook's message: No one above the law here - 3
- 'Economic patriotism'; tax rates and border jumpers - 6
READER COMMENTS: 0
- NH Shrine team girds for Vt.'s ground attack - 0
- On Baseball: Fishers prospects sweat out deadline day - 0
- Goffstown ready for LL regional tourney - 0
- Dave D'Onofrio's Sox Beat -- Message is clear: Offense needs boost - 0
- Marina dealers say boat sales are on the rise - 0
- Another View -- Gilles Bissonnette: Why voting in NH is not reserved for state residents - 0
- John Stossel: Healthy profits? - 0
- Clinton vs. speech: Bullying first; what next? - 0
- Another View - Charles Lane: Your money is being spent by dead people - 0
Havenstein says he has always opposed Obamacare, though company he led was paid to implement parts of it
George Will: A conservative internationalism
Another View -- Gilles Bissonnette, William Christie, Alan Cronheim and Benjamin Siracusa Hillman: Why voting in NH is not reserved for state residents
Heroes all? A word cheapened by overuse
Market Basket customers mobilize
Mark Hayward's City Matters: Market Basket workers' outlook challenges the skeptics among us
Police held Abby suspect's guns
Punch line: The NFL blows it