Aug 28, 2014
Aug 21, 2014
Aug 14, 2014
Jul 24, 2014
Prosecutors urge charge be upheld against Danville’s police chief
Assistant Rockingham County Attorney Terri Harrington last week filed an objection to a recent motion by Parsons’ attorney that seeks to have the charge dismissed.
Parsons’ lawyer, Alan Cronheim of Sisti Law Offices, argues the law refers only to a minor under age 16 accessing a firearm and using it in a reckless or negligent manner and doesn’t apply to suicides. He said Parsons can’t be held liable because in this case the gun was “purposefully” used to commit suicide and that it was neither reckless nor negligent.
“It only matters that an improperly secured firearm was fired by someone under the proscribed age,” she wrote.
“To assert that this statute is only meant to apply to accidents by relying on the language ‘said firearm was negligently or recklessly discharged’ is to turn common sense on its head. This is a child safety law. New Hampshire seeks to protect children from access to firearms. New Hampshire seeks to protect children from gun accidents, suicides and mass shootings. To state otherwise is to ignore a horrifying and growing reality in this country that children are gaining access to loaded guns. They are not just falling prey to accidents alone, but are able to wreak havoc on themselves and the general public,” Harrington wrote.
“Defendant was aware that J.C. would be home, even if he, defendant, was not. J.C. had a bedroom in the home and was expected home later in the day. Knowing this, he left a loaded and fully operable .40-caliber handgun where it could be found and used. He placed it ‘under clothing’ in his closet, hardly a best practice while a 15-year-old boy is staying in the home. It is not ‘hypothetical or speculative’ that a 15-year-old boy would be curious about a service revolver,” she wrote.
A hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for Feb. 24 at 8:15 a.m. in the Salem Circuit Court.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- NH killer in 1991 Smart trial seeks time with wife - 0
- Newport shooting victim in stable but critical condition - 0
- Nashua arrests 9 on drug warrants - 0
- Police: Nashua man in car targeted by gunfire was felon with gun - 0
- Man shot at in Nashua drive-by charged with unrelated possession of stolen gun - 0
- NH Supreme Court rules 4 teen killers entitled to sentencing hearings - 6
- Hampton woman who fatally struck pedestrian wants blood test thrown out of court - 0
- Man seeks to upend conviction in Deerfield home invasion case - 0
- Police say North Hampton man distributed child sex abuse images - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Goffstown's Bourque impresses; Memorial, Bishop Guertin, Pinkerton win in Queen City Jamboree - 0
- Hanover boys soccer edges defense-minded BG - 0
- NH Fisher Cats, Pierre stun Rock Cats in 4-3 win - 0
- Helping hands for new St. Anselm students in Manchester on move in day - 0
- To market, to market: Market Basket shoppers flock on in - 0
- Nashua Market Basket employee: 'Worth every day of work lost' - 0
- NH teen killers to get sentence reviews after state Supreme Court decision - 0
- Lakes Region Casino for sale last two months; asking price $3.5 million, manager says - 0
- Hudson police warn of cars being broken into - 0
Where is Shaheen? Hiding from you
Enter to win tickets to see Paula Poundstone
Hooksett highs: A good multiple choice test
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917