Aug 28, 2014
Aug 21, 2014
Aug 14, 2014
Jul 24, 2014
Judge orders fired Manchester officer back to jail to finish sentence
Coco had been released June 5 at the discretion of Hillsborough County Jail Superintendent David Dionne, 72 days after he began serving his sentence. The release was provisional, with Coco ordered to keep in daily contact with correction officials.
But Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge Gillian decided the release from jail was inappropriate. Abramson said: “His conduct merits nothing less than the original sentence imposed.”
Abramson said Coco is “a defendant who requires punishment and deterrence, goals of sentencing not served or met by release after just 72 days in jail.”
Coco, a 17-year police officer, had been promoted to sergeant not long before the March 22, 2013, incident. He struck and injured two teens while driving an undercover police SUV and left the scene without stopping. Coco pleaded guilty to two felony charges of conduct after an accident in a negotiated plea.
In her order, Abramson wrote that in Coco’s case, “participation in a day reporting program, without the need for rehabilitation, is the functional equivalent of release from custody.” That, she wrote, “is inappropriate and defendant shall be returned to the Hillsborough County House of Corrections to serve the remainder of his sentence.”
Sullivan County Attorney Marc Hathaway, who prosecuted the case, Thursday said: “The court made a very well reasoned decision that validates the sentencing.” He said the sentence was meant to be a specific deterrent, a general deterrent and punishment.
Coco, who admitted to having a glass of wine several hours before leaving a colleague’s residence, said he was distracted by his cell phone and didn’t know he had hit the teens. One teen was thrown 20 feet and sustained a back injury and a broken elbow. The other teen was run over and suffered bleeding on the brain and a concussion. Both have recovered.
Dionne said he had moved Coco to the Coos County Jail in West Stewartstown to serve his sentence for safety reasons, but Coco was still in Dionne’s custody and would be for the duration of his sentence. Now, with credit for good behavior, Coco would be released in November, after completing eight months of the sentence. Coco also has a suspended sentence, two years of probation and was ordered to pay restitution.
Dionne was able to change Coco’s classification under a 2013 law that gave superintendents the authority to make decisions about releasing prisoners on work release, home confinement with an anklet or day report status without obtaining a judge’s oversight. Dionne said he determined Coco was a candidate for day report status.
Dionne said the jail superintendents sought the change because it could take months to get a hearing before a judge on a petition for status change, which could jeopardize prisoner jobs, Social Security benefits and medications and rehabilitation programs.
But the change also included the requirement that the superintendent notify the prosecution, who could request a hearing if there was an objection to the reclassification. Dionne notified Hathaway on June 13 that Coco had been released.
Hathaway, who had been appointed to avoid any concerns about possible conflict of interest, objected to the reclassification and requested a hearing before Abramson. The hearing was held on Monday.
Hathaway had requested that the original sentencing order forbid home confinement, but Abramson did not do so at the time. She noted in Thursday order that she had specifically made no recommendation for rehabilitative release because “defendant is not in need of rehabilitation.”
READER COMMENTS: 0
- NH killer in 1991 Smart trial seeks time with wife - 0
- Newport shooting victim in stable but critical condition - 0
- Nashua arrests 9 on drug warrants - 0
- Police: Nashua man in car targeted by gunfire was felon with gun - 0
- Man shot at in Nashua drive-by charged with unrelated possession of stolen gun - 0
- NH Supreme Court rules 4 teen killers entitled to sentencing hearings - 6
- Hampton woman who fatally struck pedestrian wants blood test thrown out of court - 0
- Man seeks to upend conviction in Deerfield home invasion case - 0
- Police say North Hampton man distributed child sex abuse images - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Goffstown's Bourque impresses; Memorial, Bishop Guertin, Pinkerton win in Queen City Jamboree - 0
- Hanover boys soccer edges defense-minded BG - 0
- NH Fisher Cats, Pierre stun Rock Cats in 4-3 win - 0
- Helping hands for new St. Anselm students in Manchester on move in day - 0
- To market, to market: Market Basket shoppers flock on in - 0
- Nashua Market Basket employee: 'Worth every day of work lost' - 0
- NH teen killers to get sentence reviews after state Supreme Court decision - 0
- Lakes Region Casino for sale last two months; asking price $3.5 million, manager says - 0
- Hudson police warn of cars being broken into - 0
Where is Shaheen? Hiding from you
Goffstown's Bourque impresses; Memorial, Bishop Guertin, Pinkerton win in Queen City Jamboree
Enter to win tickets to see Paula Poundstone
Hooksett highs: A good multiple choice test
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917