Handling sex offenders: Listen to the police
Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2009 Share on Facebook
A special task force appointed to examine how Manchester should deal with sex offenders has recommended against imposing residency restrictions. Before people spout off about politicians not caring about the welfare of children, all should note that the task force chairman, Manchester Police Sgt. Scott Fuller, was one who argued strongly against the restrictions.
Fuller, who spent years keeping tabs on city sex offenders, is one of many police officers who oppose banning sex offenders from living near schools, parks or day care centers. He has long maintained that the bans not only don't protect kids, but actually put them in more danger.
Bans increase the odds that offenders won't register with the police, making it harder to find them.
Fuller recommended that Manchester try other ways of keeping offenders away from kids, such as banning day care centers in homes where offenders live. That makes more sense than enacting a policy that sends them underground.
Get Morning Headlines and News Alerts from UnionLeader.com
YOUR COMMENTS
The voices of UnionLeader.com readers: To join UnionLeader.com's discussion of the news, use the form below.
NOTE: If you have read this article before, you may not be seeing the newest comments. Press F5. Or click "Refresh" or "Reload" at the top of this page while holding down Ctrl. All approved postings will appear. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)
Why not utilize the technology that's currently in place and at the cost of the offender. GPS Monitoring with software boundries built into the system at the central monitoring station.
Their every whereabouts could be known and tracked 24/7.
But No, this backward Technology state is 10 years behind in the acquisition of current high technology.
No expense to the taxpayer and the police can stop chasisng them and sinply access a live database and see where they are live or where they have been.
I'm so tired or harping on this in the UL. Nobody listens. The DEA uses it to track drug dealers with bumper beepers. All kinds of other law Enforcement and the private sector uses it.
Is it that they'll be no money in it for someone? I really don't know but the technology is in place right now to do it at the offenders cost, not the taxpayer.
- BA, Derry
Since sex offenders are so likely to offend again, how about we keep them locked up instead of imposing silly bans on where they can live.
- Joe, Manchester
Banning sex offenders is useless and counter productive to the registration system...banning does not preclude these persons from driving, walking nor traveling. So you cannot keep them away from children no matter what you do to attempt to designate living arrangements. Let's get realistic and recognize that banning them is masking, or worsening, the problem. I'd love to see convicted sex offenders jailed or forced to have a hot yellow banner bumper sitcker on the back of their car stating they are a convicted sex offender. THEN we would know where they are some of the time! And it's also time for review of the actions that create a sex offender crime. Peeing in public behind a bush should not be a sex offender crime.
- Nancy from New Hampshire, Hooksett
I've not seen any studies that show that limiting residence locations provides a safer community.
Each offender needs to be restricted on an individual basis--a blanket rule or regulation is unlikely to be to society's advantage.
- Peter, Jaffrey
We want a ban to get a lot of them out of Manchester. Why are we the dump? I bet Fuller lives in a suburb like Chief Mirror.
- Mina, Manchester
I agree with the task force on this subject. I've done extensive research on this topic, and the vast majority of qualified scholarly work suggests that residency restrictions simply do not work. They are examples of 'feel good legislation' that allows politicians to champion false senses of crime security.
Furthermore, the majority of sex offenders who do indeed reoffend do so with victims they are familiar with.
- Leon P., Manchester
I think the argument that the office made was that people could not babysit other people's kids if a sex offender was in the house.
- Justin, Hooksett
Do we really need a law banning day care centers from being run in homes where a sex offender resides?
I'm sorry but if that's the best we can get on the table I'd say we as a society need to think about what direction this nation is going. Maybe we need to look backwards in time for our answers rather than keeping on the progressive track.
- Deb, Derry
OK, I understand the argument the officer is making and we should listen to someone with his experience.
But if banning offenders from living near a day care center drives them underground why would banning them from living in a day care center not do the same?
- John Bachman, Amherst