Pointless tangent in article about Rye man’s benefits suit

To the Editor: What in the world does being conservative and a past member of the Federalist Society have to do with Michael Lewis representing Claude Pottier? And you might as well add his teaching position and his employment status, though one can justify inclusion of these to show Mr. Lewis’s presumed knowledge of the law. Perhaps future articles will also provide a person’s favorite food?

JIM SERNA

Hooksett