AS THE SON of two New Hampshire educators and a proud graduate of Manchester public schools, I was raised to believe in the promise of public education. And for my three children, public schools should provide them the same opportunity and promise. But it is clear that Governor Chris Sununu and Republicans in the State House do not believe in strong public schools. At every opportunity Sununu has undermined our public education system and now he has signed a budget that has disastrous implications for our students, educators, and communities.
Sununu’s budget introduces a voucher program that diverts taxpayer dollars from public schools to private and religious schools. That means when a child enrolls in a private or religious school, or is homeschooled, the state will send those families a check. School districts will lose between $4,000 and $5,000 per child that leaves the district. Meanwhile, the average cost of private school tuition in New Hampshire is $19,500. This plan that siphons money from our public schools won’t even help many families afford private school tuition.
The voucher program is estimated to cost towns across our state $70 million according to a study from Reaching Higher New Hampshire. That loss in state education funding will result in higher property taxes for communities across New Hampshire.
While vouchers subsidize wealthy private schools, they will downshift costs to local communities. As a selectman in Brentwood, I know that our town will have to deal with the loss of public education funding one of two ways: by cutting public education services or raising taxes. Neither of those choices is one I want to make, and it’s not something families in any of our communities deserve.
That’s why mayors from Nashua to Berlin wrote a letter to the State House asking legislators and the governor to reject a voucher program. In the letter, the mayors said “we all have concerns about the potential for this initiative to downshift costs onto the property taxpayers of our respective cities” and warned Sununu that “with just a 3% take up rate among public school families in our school districts, we collectively could be facing millions of dollars of new local property taxes.” Property taxes are already high enough, and the governor’s voucher scheme will exacerbate that problem.
This isn’t surprising, Sununu has undermined public education since his first day in office. Sununu appointed Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut despite his clear hostility toward public education.
Sununu has also repeatedly attacked funding for our public and higher education systems. He has proposed flat-funding or decreasing funding for colleges in every budget. He delayed COVID-19 funding to public schools so Betsy DeVos could finish drawing up rules to siphon off more money from public schools to private and religious schools. And he has finally succeeded at defunding public schools through this unaccountable voucher system. All of these actions have one goal in common: to undermine public education.
Enough is enough. Students, educators, and taxpayers deserve schools where every child can thrive. We need to improve the opportunity of public education, not pursue schemes that siphon funds away from public schools to boost wealthy private and religious schools. Sununu’s voucher plan is bad for our students, bad for our educators, and bad for property taxpayers.
Granite Staters need to raise their voices and tell Governor Sununu his voucher plan is wrong for New Hampshire.
Jon Morgan (D) is chairman of Amplify New Hampshire, an advocacy and state accountability non-profit. He lives in Brentwood, where he is a selectman.
IN HER recent op-ed “A pro-lifer and a pro choicer do lunch”, Mona Charen posits that easily available and inexpensive contraception would reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and thus reduce the number of abortions. This might work in a small number of cases. However, if the contracept…
WHAT DEFINES a community? Is it a location, a value system, a bit of both? Should something be called a “community center” when the people who live there don’t want it? Can you claim to be building “community” when you don’t inform abutters, the residents who would be most impacted?
IN 1992, before appointment to the bench, I was excited upon learning the U.S. Supreme Court would hear the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey to reconsider Roe v. Wade. Though pro-choice, I wrote an op-ed explaining my view that Roe should be overruled.
REPUBLICANS don’t want you to know this, but the school voucher program they enacted last year is a ticking time bomb that, unless fixed, will only be defused with massive tax hikes on Granite Staters.
WALKING DOWN a grocery aisle in Concord, it’s clear to see that costs are on the rise in New Hampshire. I hear about these costs all the time from my constituents, friends, and neighbors. As a working parent, I see the impact every single day on our family budget. The cost to fill up our gas…
WHAT MAKES New Hampshirites who we are? It’s hard to pin down. There’s a lot of difference here in background, in thought and in lifestyle for a state with a smaller population than nine U.S. cities.
I CAN’T SPEAK to all of the misstatements in Kathleen Sullivan’s recent hit piece on the Free State Project (FSP), but I can correct the ones she made regarding the Town of Croydon. These corrections can be verified by looking at the minutes or recordings of the relevant meetings.
I WOULD point anyone — such as eight-term state Rep. Al Baldassaro — still bandying about the foolish mantra that “we have term limits, they are called elections” to Kevin Landrigan’s State House Dome in the July 10th edition of the New Hampshire Sunday News.
