STEADILY, and mostly behind the scenes, an affordable-housing strategy has preserved nearly 8,500 New Hampshire homes over 39 years. It has kept dollars circulating in local communities and has inspired a successful national housing movement.

Now the New Hampshire Senate is considering legislation that would destroy it.

The nonprofit New Hampshire Community Loan Fund is an organization that has helped 140 groups of manufactured-home park residents purchase their parks and manage them as cooperatives, or ROCs (resident-owned communities).

ROCs are populated by New Hampshire’s workforce: essential workers including teachers, firefighters, service workers, truck drivers, and restaurant and retail staff. Because manufactured homes are one-story and compact, they’re also ideal for seniors and people with disabilities.

Unless you’ve lived in a manufactured (sometimes called mobile) home park, you may not know that homeowners pay rent to the park’s owner for their use of the house lot and shared park area. Ownership is very lucrative and competition to buy parks is fierce among private equity firms, which pay above-market prices because they can increase rents to achieve exorbitant profits. When they succeed, their ever-rising rents are hoovered out of the community and into investors’ pockets. Homeowners unable to afford higher rent are displaced.

Resident-ownership of parks keeps homes affordable by eliminating the profit motive and putting budget decisions directly in homeowners’ hands. Each ROC is a not-for-profit democracy. Memberships vote to increase lot rents only when necessary to meet costs or increase services.

Resident-ownership also means families won’t be evicted because a park owner wants to use the land for some other purpose.

The Community Loan Fund, often in partnership with local banks, finances these purchases at rates the park’s homeowners can afford. Its ROC-NH program supplies training and technical assistance that help the residents, few of whom have ever sat on the board of a multi-million-dollar business, manage their communities as volunteers.

Not one of these cooperatives has ever failed or reverted to private ownership. Not one. That’s an extraordinary achievement, given that 75% of cooperative members qualify as low or moderate income and many are seniors on fixed incomes.

Recently introduced, Senate Bill 210 threatens this form of affordable housing preservation by requiring more than half of the households in a community to vote in favor of an offer to purchase it. This is an unreasonable threshold that, if signed into law, will destroy this self-help program.

New Hampshire allows as few as five individuals to form a cooperative corporation. A simple majority of co-op members may elect to buy their park. Members elect boards of directors to oversee their community, and vote on rules, budgets, and the rent they pay to the cooperative. Residents are not required to join the cooperative, nor to participate in its business.

Although New Hampshire’s current ROCs enjoy nearly 100% co-op membership, that is never the case at the stage SB 210 addresses — when residents are first debating whether to buy their park. Residents decline to participate for a variety of very valid reasons, including fear of retaliation by the current or future park owners, lack of transportation to meetings (few parks have meeting spaces large enough to accommodate a majority of homeowners there), the need to work or care for children or family members with disabilities, or skepticism that buying their park is a possibility.

The municipal equivalent to SB 210 would be requiring approval of 51% of all potential voters — not just those who choose to vote — to win an election or pass a ballot initiative. It’s an extremely rare town or city election that turns out 50% of its potential voters, much less gets a majority of them to vote on the same side.

The only effect of SB 210 will be to eliminate the option of residents purchasing the parks they live in. Park owners have nothing to gain by passage of this bill. The cooperative meets the price of a Purchase and Sale agreement the owner has previously received. The owner gets the exact same amount of money/profit at closing whether the buyer is an outside investor or a resident cooperative.

The current law works well. Even without the 51% voting requirement, many resident groups successfully oppose cooperative ownership of their parks. Of the 14 resident groups the Community Loan Fund has worked with in the past six months, only five have voted to become ROCs.

SB 210 is a solution in search of a problem. Its passage will lead to less housing security and fewer affordable housing opportunities for New Hampshire’s working families and seniors at a time when such housing is scarce across the state.

I urge you to contact your state Senators and ask them to oppose SB 210.

Steve Saltzman is president and CEO of the New Hampshire Community Loan Fund. He lives in Concord.

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

OPPONENTS of the “Right to Freedom from Discrimination in Public Workplaces and Education” law are disturbingly advocating for the ability to teach racist, sexist, and discriminatory ideology in New Hampshire schools. But, why? Do they actually believe that some people are inherently superio…

Monday, January 17, 2022
Sunday, January 16, 2022
Friday, January 14, 2022
Thursday, January 13, 2022

CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON’S January 9 column, “People are quitting their jobs in record numbers”, points to management failures and an employee awakening as factors in the significant number of people changing jobs. I’d like to address a few things employers can do to retain and motivate workers.

Wednesday, January 12, 2022

STOP THE PRESSES, because Kamala Harris got something right. That’s not something even her strongest allies have been able to say often — if at all — so when it happens, we should all take heed.

Tuesday, January 11, 2022

A FEW YEARS AGO at a gathering in my town, a fiery speaker said that our government is reaching into our pockets through taxation in order to steal our hard-earned money to pay for programs that are simply giveaways to growing numbers of the “undeserving.” This is not true.